XPost: sac.politics, can.politics, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.politics.homosexuality   
      
   On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 18:40:34 -0500, "M.I.Wakefield"  wrote:   
   .   
   >On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 18:23:58 -0500, mur wrote:   
   >   
   >>On Thu, 5 Feb 2015 17:06:18 -0500, "M.I.Wakefield"  wrote:   
   >>.   
   >>>"mur" wrote in message news:65o7dat16h43pa4uok40rufbrktkodnl62@4ax.com...   
   >>>   
   >>>>    Here's a challenge that has completely defeated every atheist in these   
   >>>> ngs   
   >>>> for months and months to the point that none of them have been able to   
   >>>> provide a   
   >>>> single respectable reply to it. See if you can be the first to: Try to   
   >>>> explain   
   >>>> WHAT type of evidence you think there should be, WHERE you think it should   
   >>>> be,   
   >>>> WHY you think it should be available to humans, and WHEN you think it   
   >>>> should   
   >>>> have been or should be made available, if there truly is a God associated   
   >>>> with   
   >>>> this planet.   
   >>>   
   >>>Physical manifestation.  At least 60 feet tall.  Times Square, New York   
   >>>City.  6:30 PM today.  So you've got over an hour to get everything   
   >>>arranged.   
   >>   
   >>    I specified a single respectable reply. There have been other stupid   
   >>replies. So far yours is the most stupid thing anyone has suggested though,   
   so   
   >>maybe you can feel proud of yourself for that, but you still haven't met the   
   >>challenge. NONE OF YOU have met the challenge so it has STILL defeated every   
   one   
   >>of you completely and entirely.   
   >   
   >Yeah, I noticed that your god failed to show up as well.   
      
       How do you know? Were you there? But even though you could have no clue if   
   he showed up or not, don't forget I pointed out for you that in a group of   
   stupid replies, your reply was and still is the most stupid of all of them. And   
   if God exists and is aware of your stupid reply he's also more aware of how   
   stupid it was than I am, and I am WELL aware of it.   
      
   >Sucks to be you.   
      
       The challenge I made has STILL defeated every atheist in these ngs   
   including   
   you, so if it sux to be me for defeating all of you it must suck even more to   
   be   
   you for being so entirely defeated AND for making the most stupid reply that   
   anyone has made so far.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)