XPost: alt.atheism, alt.flame.jesus.christ, alt.talk.creationism   
   XPost: sci.skeptic   
   From: lunch@nofreelunch.us   
      
   On Sat, 14 Feb 2015 20:49:38 -0500, mur wrote:   
      
   >On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 19:00:09 -0600, Free Lunch  wrote:   
   >.   
   >>On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 17:52:34 -0700, A Nony Mouse  wrote:   
   ...   
   >>>A careful person will not reject the possibility of no gods existing on   
   >>>the basis of any evidence as yet presented, nor reject the reverse   
   >>>possibility on that evidence.   
   >>>   
   >>>Such careful persons are called agnostics.   
   >>   
   >>Not really. Agnostics say that they do not know and cannot know if any   
   >>deities exist. They may be believers or not be believers.   
   >   
   >    Do you think there's no distinction between strong and weak agnostics? How   
   >about strong and weak atheists? Your idiot brother bilgat can't comprehend the   
   >distinction between any of them, or even that there is a distinction. Are you   
   as   
   >clueless as that idiot?   
      
   I have no idea what distinction you imagine exists among agnostics other   
   than belief in god or unbelief, theist or atheist.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)