XPost: alt.atheism, alt.flame.jesus.christ, alt.talk.creationism   
   XPost: sci.skeptic   
      
   On Tue, 24 Feb 2015 09:02:15 -0700, Bob Casanova  wrote:   
   .   
   >On Mon, 23 Feb 2015 14:04:35 -0700, the following appeared   
   >in sci.skeptic, posted by A Nony Mouse :   
   >   
   >>In article , grabber  wrote:   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>>        If a person can only consider the possibility that there's no God   
   >>> associated with Earth, and can't consider the possibility that there is,   
   then   
   >>> the person can only "have" the one possible belief. HOW would you like to   
   try   
   >>> pretending that fact is not true? WHY do you want to pretend it's not   
   true, do   
   >>> you have any idea at all about that?   
   >>   
   >>       If a person can only consider the possibility that there is a God   
   >>associated with Earth, and can't consider the possibility that there   
   >>isn't, then the person can only "have" the one possible belief. HOW   
   >>would you like to try pretending that fact is not true? WHY do you want   
   >>to pretend it's not true, do you have any idea at all about that?   
   >   
   >That was mur, not grabber.   
      
       No, grabber couldn't do anything at all.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)