XPost: alt.atheism   
   From: malte_runz@forgitit.dk   
      
   "felix_unger"  skrev i meddelelsen news:clq3k0Fug4sU1@mid.individual.net...   
   >   
   > On 05-March-2015 3:36 AM, Malte Runz wrote:   
   > > "felix_unger"  skrev i meddelelsen   
   > > news:cln0uvF6fenU2@mid.individual.net...   
   > >>   
   > >> On 21-February-2015 10:31 PM, Malte Runz wrote:   
   > >> > "Jeanne Douglas"  skrev i meddelelsen >   
   > >> news:hlwdjsd2-02A7CF.14593020022015@news.giganews.com...   
   > >> >>   
   > >> >> In article , mur wrote:   
   > >> >   
   > >> > (snip)   
   > >> >   
   > >> >> >     I can consider the possibility that there's no such being as   
   > >> >> Satan, > but I   
   > >> >> > can also consider the possibility that there is.   
   > >> >>   
   > >> >> So can I. So what's your point?   
   > >> >   
   > >> > But you can't do it realistically. No atheist can. If they could   
   > >> they > wouldn't be atheists...   
   > >>   
   > >> yes   
   > >   
   > > This might help:   
   > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarcasm   
   > >   
   > >>   
   > >> > or something. The point is, he is superior to all of us.   
   > >>   
   > >> yes, because to allow for possibilities is better than to deny them   
   > >   
   > > That's why you must realistically consider the existence of Dog Heads.   
   > > But if you come to the realization that you cannot believe in their   
   > > existence, you have failed, and the people who do believe in the   
   > > /possible/ existence of Dog Heads are therefor superior to you.   
   > >   
   > > See how that works?   
   > >   
   > >   
   >   
   > If something is a REAL possibility, it makes no sense to believe it's not   
   > a possibility. like UFO's for example.   
      
   And the existence of a god is a more real possibility than the existence of   
   Dog Heads?   
      
      
   --   
   Malte Runz   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)