XPost: sac.politics, alt.atheism, alt.politics.homosexuality
XPost: rec.arts.tv
On Sat, 28 Feb 2015 01:11:31 -0800, Jeanne Douglas
wrote:
.
>In article <6100d646e56f3a56945d8feb86f3cea3@dizum.com>,
> "Carmine" wrote:
>
>> In article
>> Mitchell Holman wrote:
>> >
>> > mur wrote in news:gcqveahsh60t4eggnur0t96k60ocq57g9r@4ax.com:
>> >
>> > > On Fri, 20 Feb 2015 16:45:13 -0600, Mitchell Holman
>> > > wrote: .
>> > >>mur wrote in news:5iafeah6t3his33euknmf31kdqkhokde4i@4ax.com:
>> > >>
>> > >>> On Sat, 14 Feb 2015 20:52:56 -0600, Mitchell Holman
>> > >>> wrote: .
>> > >>>>On Sat, 14 Feb 2015 20:49:17 -0500, mur wrote:
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>>>On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 17:41:18 -0600, Mitchell Holman
>> > >>>>> wrote: .
>> > >>>>>>mur wrote in news:dl4ldalk1uqlcf3qnh8f4e5hhp8n28a1ul@4ax.com:
>> > >>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>> On Thu, 05 Feb 2015 15:44:43 -0600, Mitchell Holman
>> > >>>>>>> wrote:
>> > >>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>> Here's a fact for you: Atheists have nothing at all
>> > >>>>>>>>> constraining them in any
>> > >>>>>>>>> way.
>> > >>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>> Which means their morality is independent
>> > >>>>>>>>of any system of divine rewards or punishments.
>> > >>>>>>>>Sounds like a superior form to me.......
>> > >>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>> How does lying that there's no evidence of God's existence
>> > >>>>>>> sound better to
>> > >>>>>>> you than not lying about it and dealing with what evidence there
>> > >>>>>>> is?
>> > >>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>
>> > >>>>>> What evidence is that?
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>> Life itself is evidence.
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> Life is evidence of life.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Even IF humans eventually are able to produce life from lifeless
>> > >>> material
>> > >>> life might STILL remain evidence of God's existence.
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> "Might"?
>> > >>
>> > >> Your whole faith is based on what MIGHT be evidence?
>> > >
>> > > I don't have faith that there's a God associated with Earth. I'm a
>> > > weak
>> > > agnostic so I consider the possibility that there is not, and also
>> > > that there is. What I pointed out is still a fact though. Is there
>> > > something you don't like about it, and if so, how would you rather
>> > > things be different?
>> >
>> >
>> > What you accept on faith is your business.
>>
>> Then why are you atheists always sticking your nose up the arses
>> of Christians?
>
>They invade our home newsgroup.
We challenge your claims and beliefs to see if there's anything of value to
them. So far there doesn't appear to be, which we also point out for you but
you
can't appreciate that aspect of it. From there we consider why that might be...
>What do you think
I seems somewhat significant that all of you people can't do any better
than
you're able to against a much smaller number.
>we shouldn't defend our home turf against invaders?
There's one particular challenge that has totally defeated every one of you
for months now both as individuals and as a group. If any of you were able to
give a respectable answer to the challenge it would suggest that you people
might have some idea what you think you're trying to talk about. But so far not
one of you has been able to provide any respectable responce to it. Here it is
again, in case any of you can finally provide one:
Try to explain WHAT type of evidence you think there should be, WHERE you think
it should be, WHY you think it should be available to humans, and WHEN you
think
it should have been or should be made available, if there truly is a God
associated with this planet.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
