XPost: sac.politics, can.politics, alt.atheism
XPost: alt.politics.homosexuality
On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 00:49:05 -0800, Jeanne Douglas
wrote:
.
>On Thu, 26 Feb 2015 22:51:02 -0500, mur wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 21 Feb 2015 12:31:36 +0100, Chicken wrote:
>>.
>>>"Jeanne Douglas" skrev i meddelelsen
>>>news:hlwdjsd2-02A7CF.14593020022015@news.giganews.com...
>>>>
>>>> In article , mur wrote:
>>>
>>>(snip)
>>>
>>>> > I can consider the possibility that there's no such being as Satan,
>>>> > but I
>>>> > can also consider the possibility that there is.
>>>>
>>>> So can I. So what's your point?
>>>
>>>But you can't do it realistically. No atheist can. If they could they
>>>wouldn't be atheists... or something.
>>
>> That's pretty much the way it is. If any of you would like to pretend
it's
>>different though, then go ahead and try. Let's see how you do with it.
>>
>>>The point is, he is superior to all of us.
>>
>> You people like to feel that you're superior because you can't think
>>realistically about how God could exist. You try to get those who can to
>>unlearn. But so far no one has suggested how that position could be superior.
>>Maybe someone can finally do it now? And it's not that I'm so superior to
>>atheists, but it is that atheists are so inferior to everyone who can
consider
>>the possibility of God's existence.
>
>Where do you get that?
You can only think of it from one position while other people can think of
it from the one you can and more. You probably won't even accept that fact as
being a fact--somehow--but if something ever made you accept it you would then
figure out a way of making the fact seem insignificant to you, somehow.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
