XPost: alt.atheism, alt.flame.jesus.christ, alt.talk.creationism   
   XPost: sci.skeptic   
   From: lunch@nofreelunch.us   
      
   On Thu, 05 Mar 2015 21:34:43 -0500, mur wrote:   
      
   >On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 16:15:22 -0600, Free Lunch  wrote:   
   >.   
   >>On Thu, 26 Feb 2015 22:50:22 -0500, mur wrote:   
   >>   
   >>>On Fri, 20 Feb 2015 17:00:47 -0600, Free Lunch  wrote:   
   >>>.   
   >>>>On Fri, 20 Feb 2015 16:42:02 -0500, mur wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>On Sun, 15 Feb 2015 09:32:40 -0600, Free Lunch    
   wrote:   
   >>>>>.   
   >>>>>>On Sat, 14 Feb 2015 20:49:38 -0500, mur wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 19:00:09 -0600, Free Lunch    
   wrote:   
   >>>>>>>.   
   >>>>>>>>On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 17:52:34 -0700, A Nony Mouse  wrote:   
   >>>>>>...   
   >>>>>>>>>A careful person will not reject the possibility of no gods existing   
   on   
   >>>>>>>>>the basis of any evidence as yet presented, nor reject the reverse   
   >>>>>>>>>possibility on that evidence.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>Such careful persons are called agnostics.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>Not really. Agnostics say that they do not know and cannot know if any   
   >>>>>>>>deities exist. They may be believers or not be believers.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>    Do you think there's no distinction between strong and weak   
   agnostics? How   
   >>>>>>>about strong and weak atheists? Your idiot brother bilgat can't   
   comprehend the   
   >>>>>>>distinction between any of them, or even that there is a distinction.   
   Are you as   
   >>>>>>>clueless as that idiot?   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>I have no idea what distinction you imagine exists among agnostics other   
   >>>>>>than belief in god or unbelief, theist or atheist.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>    Strong agnostics believe it can't be known whether or not God exists.   
   Weak   
   >>>>>agnostics believe that if God does exist it is possible for some people   
   to know   
   >>>>>it. I'm a weak agnostic and consider strong agnosticism to be even more   
   stupid   
   >>>>>than strong atheism.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>Tell us about the evidence that can be gathered to show that a deity   
   >>>>exists.   
   >>>   
   >>>    For a person to know it it would be between God and the i   
   dividual...LOL...   
   >>>It's amusing to think you feel there should be proof for everyone always   
   >>>available. It's like if you think everyone who goes in Walmart should be   
   >>>entitled to get a paycheck even if they don't work there. Hilarious! Not so   
   much   
   >>>that there couldn't be a planet with a God who DOES provide free easy proof   
   for   
   >>>everybody, but since it's obvious that's not the case here it's amusing   
   that you   
   >>>think it should be that way and keep demanding it...LOL... over and over and   
   >>>over again.   
   >>   
   >>So you have no evidence that any deity exists   
   >   
   >    No that's a lie and by now I feel sure I've presented you with evidence   
   >meaning that you're aware it's a lie.   
      
   I'm sure you have never presented any evidence that any deities exist.   
   If you imagine you have, please repost it or post references to other   
   evidence.   
      
   >>and offer a meaningless   
   >>word salad in place of an answer.   
   >   
   >    I pointed out aspects of the position WE ALL are in that you're not able   
   to   
   >comprehend much less appreciate...LOL...which is why it's "meaningless" to   
   you.   
      
   You seem to be here just to act silly.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)