XPost: alt.atheism, alt.flame.jesus.christ, alt.talk.creationism
XPost: sci.skeptic
On Fri, 06 Mar 2015 11:00:00 -0600, Free Lunch wrote:
.
>On Thu, 05 Mar 2015 21:34:43 -0500, mur wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 16:15:22 -0600, Free Lunch wrote:
>>.
>>>On Thu, 26 Feb 2015 22:50:22 -0500, mur wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Fri, 20 Feb 2015 17:00:47 -0600, Free Lunch
wrote:
>>>>.
>>>>>On Fri, 20 Feb 2015 16:42:02 -0500, mur wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Sun, 15 Feb 2015 09:32:40 -0600, Free Lunch
wrote:
>>>>>>.
>>>>>>>On Sat, 14 Feb 2015 20:49:38 -0500, mur wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 19:00:09 -0600, Free Lunch
wrote:
>>>>>>>>.
>>>>>>>>>On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 17:52:34 -0700, A Nony Mouse wrote:
>>>>>>>...
>>>>>>>>>>A careful person will not reject the possibility of no gods existing
on
>>>>>>>>>>the basis of any evidence as yet presented, nor reject the reverse
>>>>>>>>>>possibility on that evidence.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Such careful persons are called agnostics.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Not really. Agnostics say that they do not know and cannot know if any
>>>>>>>>>deities exist. They may be believers or not be believers.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Do you think there's no distinction between strong and weak
agnostics? How
>>>>>>>>about strong and weak atheists? Your idiot brother bilgat can't
comprehend the
>>>>>>>>distinction between any of them, or even that there is a distinction.
Are you as
>>>>>>>>clueless as that idiot?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I have no idea what distinction you imagine exists among agnostics other
>>>>>>>than belief in god or unbelief, theist or atheist.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Strong agnostics believe it can't be known whether or not God
exists. Weak
>>>>>>agnostics believe that if God does exist it is possible for some people
to know
>>>>>>it. I'm a weak agnostic and consider strong agnosticism to be even more
stupid
>>>>>>than strong atheism.
>>>>>
>>>>>Tell us about the evidence that can be gathered to show that a deity
>>>>>exists.
>>>>
>>>> For a person to know it it would be between God and the
ndividual...LOL...
>>>>It's amusing to think you feel there should be proof for everyone always
>>>>available. It's like if you think everyone who goes in Walmart should be
>>>>entitled to get a paycheck even if they don't work there. Hilarious! Not
so much
>>>>that there couldn't be a planet with a God who DOES provide free easy
proof for
>>>>everybody, but since it's obvious that's not the case here it's amusing
that you
>>>>think it should be that way and keep demanding it...LOL... over and over
and
>>>>over again.
>>>
>>>So you have no evidence that any deity exists
>>
>> No that's a lie and by now I feel sure I've presented you with evidence
>>meaning that you're aware it's a lie.
>
>I'm sure you have never presented any evidence that any deities exist.
>If you imagine you have, please repost
Life itself is evidence. All accepted miracles are evidence. All miracles
recorded in the Bible are evidence. All saints are evidence. Atheists are
evidence. All medical miracles are evidence. All prayers that seem to have been
answered are evidence. Death experiences people have and recover from are
evidence.
>it or post references to other
>evidence.
>
>>>and offer a meaningless
>>>word salad in place of an answer.
>>
>> I pointed out aspects of the position WE ALL are in that you're not able
to
>>comprehend much less appreciate...LOL...which is why it's "meaningless" to
you.
>
>You seem to be here just to act silly.
How would you like to try pretending that what I pointed out might be
incorrect, do you have any idea?
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
