XPost: alt.atheism, alt.flame.jesus.christ, alt.talk.creationism   
   XPost: sci.skeptic   
      
   On Thu, 05 Mar 2015 23:12:12 -0800, Jeanne Douglas    
   wrote:   
   .   
   >In article , mur wrote:   
   >   
   >> On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 00:29:39 -0800, Jeanne Douglas    
   >> wrote:   
   >> .   
   >> >In article , mur wrote:   
   >> >   
   >> >> On Mon, 23 Feb 2015 14:04:35 -0700, A Nony Mouse  wrote:   
   >> >>   
   >> >> >In article , grabber  wrote:   
   >> >> >   
   >> >> >   
   >> >> >   
   >> >> >>        If a person can only consider the possibility that there's no   
   >> >> >>        God   
   >> >> >> associated with Earth, and can't consider the possibility that there   
   >> >> >> is,   
   >> >> >> then   
   >> >> >> the person can only "have" the one possible belief. HOW would you like   
   >> >> >> to   
   >> >> >> try   
   >> >> >> pretending that fact is not true? WHY do you want to pretend it's not   
   >> >> >> true, do   
   >> >> >> you have any idea at all about that?   
   >> >> >   
   >> >> >       If a person can only consider the possibility that there is a God   
   >> >> >associated with Earth, and can't consider the possibility that there   
   >> >> >isn't, then the person can only "have" the one possible belief.   
   >> >>   
   >> >>     True.   
   >> >>   
   >> >> >HOW   
   >> >> >would you like to try pretending that fact is not true?   
   >> >>   
   >> >>     I wouldn't. I'm more comfortable with the truth than you atheists   
   are.   
   >> >   
   >> >What "truth" are you talking about?   
   >>   
   >>     When you can't figure out what people are talking about then it's beyond   
   >> your mental ability to comprehend.   
   >   
   >   
   >Why didn't you answer my question?   
      
       Because you've shown that you can't comprehend much MUCH less appreciate   
   what the answer is.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)