XPost: sac.politics, alt.atheism, alt.politics.homosexuality   
      
   On Thu, 05 Mar 2015 23:06:23 -0800, Jeanne Douglas    
   wrote:   
   .   
   >In article , mur wrote:   
   >   
   >> On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 00:31:42 -0800, Jeanne Douglas    
   >> wrote:   
   >> .   
   >> >In article , mur wrote:   
   >> >   
   >> >> On Fri, 20 Feb 2015 15:12:25 -0800, Jeanne Douglas   
   >> >>    
   >> >> wrote:   
   >> >>   
   >> >> >In article , mur wrote:   
   >> >> >   
   >> >> >>     The guy I mentioned was cured of cancer, and that was verified   
   many   
   >> >> >>     times   
   >> >> >> during the time I worked with him since he was still alive instead of   
   >> >> >> dead   
   >> >> >> while   
   >> >> >> still an infant.   
   >> >> >   
   >> >> >Definitely not evidence that any god exists.   
   >> >>   
   >> >>     You could have no idea whether you're lying or not about that, so why   
   >> >>     should   
   >> >> I put faith in your claim?   
   >> >>   
   >> >> >> >If you disagree, tell us how to verify any of the things you   
   >> >> >> >mentioned.   
   >> >> >> >Verification means finding independent sources for the information   
   >> >> >> >(and,   
   >> >> >> >no, you cannot use the bible to verify the bible.   
   >> >> >> >   
   >> >> >> >   
   >> >> >> >Looks like you lose again.   
   >> >> >>   
   >> >> >>     Not unless you can varify that humans have created life from   
   >> >> >>     lifeless   
   >> >> >> material, and THEN you would have to explain exactly how they did it   
   >> >> >> and   
   >> >> >> THEN   
   >> >> >> verify that those same conditions existed naturally at some point(s)   
   >> >> >> during   
   >> >> >> the   
   >> >> >> changes that went on on this planet.   
   >> >> >   
   >> >> >Why would that be necessary?   
   >> >>   
   >> >>     If you're really so clueless you can't figure something that obvious   
   >> >>     out   
   >> >>     for   
   >> >> yourself, then I don't believe you're mentally capable of understanding   
   at   
   >> >> all.   
   >> >>   
   >> >> >>     Again I point out for you that I consider the possibility that   
   >> >> >>     there's   
   >> >> >>     no   
   >> >> >> God or Satan associated with Earth, and all apparent miracles are   
   >> >> >> things   
   >> >> >> that   
   >> >> >> just happened to happen. But I also go on to consider much more than   
   >> >> >> you   
   >> >> >> do.   
   >> >> >> So   
   >> >> >> you don't need to give me things to take into consideration since I   
   >> >> >> consider   
   >> >> >> all   
   >> >> >> the things you do, but you need to give me reason to put faith in the   
   >> >> >> things   
   >> >> >> you   
   >> >> >> have faith in.   
   >> >> >   
   >> >> >What "things" do you think I have faith in?   
   >> >>   
   >> >>     Let's start with the ones I asked you about specifically.   
   >> >   
   >> >   
   >> >What "ones" are you talking about?   
   >>   
   >>     I guess there really isn't much you've had to say except lying that   
   >>     there's   
   >> no evidence. So let's go with that. I CERTAINLY have no reason at all to put   
   >> any   
   >> faith in your claim that there is none, though you act like you have great   
   >> faith   
   >> in it. Why should anyone else try to put faith in it ESPECIALLY after   
   >> pointing   
   >> out that you are evidence yourself?   
   >   
   >   
   >What the fuck are you talking about?   
      
           You're either too fucking stupid to be able to comprehend or you're   
   pretending to be more stupid than you actually fucking are.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)