XPost: sac.politics, can.politics, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.politics.homosexuality   
      
   On Thu, 05 Mar 2015 22:54:06 -0800, Jeanne Douglas    
   wrote:   
   .   
   >In article , mur wrote:   
   >   
   >> On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 00:49:05 -0800, Jeanne Douglas    
   >> wrote:   
   >> .   
   >> >On Thu, 26 Feb 2015 22:51:02 -0500, mur wrote:   
   >> >   
   >> >>On Sat, 21 Feb 2015 12:31:36 +0100, Chicken wrote:   
   >> >>.   
   >> >>>"Jeanne Douglas"  skrev i meddelelsen   
   >> >>>news:hlwdjsd2-02A7CF.14593020022015@news.giganews.com...   
   >> >>>>   
   >> >>>> In article , mur wrote:   
   >> >>>   
   >> >>>(snip)   
   >> >>>   
   >> >>>> >     I can consider the possibility that there's no such being as   
   >> >>>> >     Satan,   
   >> >>>> > but I   
   >> >>>> > can also consider the possibility that there is.   
   >> >>>>   
   >> >>>> So can I. So what's your point?   
   >> >>>   
   >> >>>But you can't do it realistically. No atheist can. If they could they   
   >> >>>wouldn't be atheists... or something.   
   >> >>   
   >> >>    That's pretty much the way it is. If any of you would like to pretend   
   >> >>    it's   
   >> >>different though, then go ahead and try. Let's see how you do with it.   
   >> >>   
   >> >>>The point is, he is superior to all of us.   
   >> >>   
   >> >>    You people like to feel that you're superior because you can't think   
   >> >>realistically about how God could exist. You try to get those who can to   
   >> >>unlearn. But so far no one has suggested how that position could be   
   >> >>superior.   
   >> >>Maybe someone can finally do it now? And it's not that I'm so superior to   
   >> >>atheists, but it is that atheists are so inferior to everyone who can   
   >> >>consider   
   >> >>the possibility of God's existence.   
   >> >   
   >> >Where do you get that?   
   >>   
   >>     You can only think of it from one position while other people can think   
   >>     of   
   >> it from the one you can and more. You probably won't even accept that fact   
   as   
   >> being a fact   
   >   
   >What fact?   
      
       In case you honestly are too stupid to figure this one out:   
      
   " You can only think of it from one position while other people can think of   
   it from the one you can and more."   
      
   >> --somehow--but if something ever made you accept it you would   
   >> then   
   >> figure out a way of making the fact seem insignificant to you, somehow.   
   >   
   >What the fuck are you talking about?   
      
       More than your overly restricted little mind can comprehend apparently. You   
   really do appear to be too stupid for this, and nothing anyone does can make   
   you   
   become less stupid.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)