XPost: sac.politics, alt.atheism, alt.politics.homosexuality   
      
   On Fri, 06 Mar 2015 05:13:02 -0800, Jeanne Douglas    
   wrote:   
   .   
   >In article ,   
   > Steve O  wrote:   
   >   
   >> On 06/03/2015 07:05, Jeanne Douglas wrote:   
   >> > In article , mur wrote:   
   >> >> On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 00:42:38 -0800, Jeanne Douglas   
   >> >>    
   >> >> wrote:   
   >> >>> In article , mur wrote:   
   >> >>>> On Fri, 20 Feb 2015 15:04:24 -0800, Jeanne Douglas   
   >> >>>>    
   >> >>>> wrote:   
   >> >   
   >> >   
   >> >>> Oh, so you do have evidence of "God's" existence. Please present it.   
   >> >>   
   >> >>      What has been presented for you in the past?   
   >> >   
   >> > Not evidence. Not ever. That's the whole point.   
   >> >   
   >> >   
   >> >>>> The idea that if   
   >> >>>>      God   
   >> >>>> does exist and Jesus did the things recorded in the Bible, those   
   records   
   >> >>>> are   
   >> >>>> not   
   >> >>>> evidence, is stupidity in the extreme.   
   >> >>>   
   >> >>> Do you have any evidence that this Jesus person ever existed? There's   
   >> >>> certainly none in the real world.   
   >> >>   
   >> >>      You have no idea what more evidence you wish you could pretend there   
   >> >>      "should   
   >> >> be" than what there is.   
   >> >   
   >> > Care to translate that word salad into English?   
   >> >   
   >> >   
   >> >>>> The idea that if God does exist and   
   >> >>>> has   
   >> >>>> performed countless miracles that people have noticed and recorded,   
   >> >>>> those   
   >> >>>> miracles are not evidence is also stupidity in the extreme.   
   >> >>>   
   >> >>> What the fuck are you talking about? Do you have any evidence that any   
   >> >>> of these miracles ever happened?   
   >> >>   
   >> >>      I've made you aware of some.   
   >> >   
   >> > That's a lie. I'm still waiting for evidence from you for ANYthing.   
   >> >   
   >> >   
   >> >>>> Even an atheist   
   >> >>>> should be able to figure that much out, but if they can't then it's   
   more   
   >> >>>> evidence of their own stupidity.   
   >> >>>   
   >> >>> Still waiting for you to provide evidence of ANYthing.   
   >> >>   
   >> >>      That lie is more evidence of you being evidence.   
   >> >   
   >> > More gibberish. Sorry, but I don't have a gibberish to English   
   >> > dictionary.   
   >> >   
   >> >   
   >> >>>>> People believe all kinds of insane shit, so your statement is really   
   >> >>>>> stupid.   
   >> >>>>   
   >> >>>>      You are evidence no matter how you try to wiggle out of it and no   
   >> >>>>      matter   
   >> >>>>      how   
   >> >>>> much you hate the fact that you are.   
   >> >>>   
   >> >>> I "are" what?   
   >> >>   
   >> >>      What did I point out for you?   
   >> >   
   >> > What does that question have to do with my question? Please answer my   
   >> > question: "I 'are' what?"   
   >> >   
   >> >   
   >> >   
   >> >>>>>>>> on supposedly   
   >> >>>>>>>> free "thinking" human minds. YOU ARE evidence.   
   >> >>>>>>>   
   >> >>>>>>> How am I evidence?   
   >> >>>>>>   
   >> >>>>>>      It's obvious that if there truly was no evidence then there   
   would   
   >> >>>>>>      be   
   >> >>>>>>      nothing   
   >> >>>>>> for anyone to believe in.   
   >> >>>>>   
   >> >>>>> Nonsense. People believe insane shti all the time.   
   >> >>>>   
   >> >>>>      Always for reasons. The reasons are evidence.   
   >> >>>   
   >> >>> Wrong again.   
   >> >>   
   >> >>      Wrong.   
   >> >   
   >> > Contradicting me doesn't make you right.   
   >> >   
   >> >   
   >> >   
   >> >>>> You have no evidence that   
   >> >>>> there's no evidence, or even evidence that the evidence you lie about   
   >> >>>> not   
   >> >>>> existing is all false.   
   >> >>>   
   >> >>> Wow, the gibberish is really getting thick.   
   >> >>   
   >> >>      You consistently show that you're a moron regarding this topic.   
   >> >   
   >> > Yes, I apologize for not speaking Gibberish. (Oh, you walked right into   
   >> > that one.)   
   >> >   
   >> >   
   >> >>>> The "best" you could have is your own faith in nothing   
   >> >>>> but a guess that it's all false, or even more stupidly possibly somehow   
   >> >>>> your   
   >> >>>> own   
   >> >>>> honest faith that it doesn't exist at all.   
   >> >>>   
   >> >>> And now it's complete and total world salad.   
   >> >>>   
   >> >>> Here's a thought--think about what you're trying to say and see if what   
   >> >>> you're typing actually gets that idea across in a sane manner.   
   >> >>   
   >> >>      Try to translate that into English.   
   >> >   
   >> > Stop speaking Gibberish.   
   >> >   
   >> >   
   >> >>>>>> Since billions of people do believe that means   
   >> >>>>>> there   
   >> >>>>>> IS evidence,   
   >> >>>>>   
   >> >>>>> Of course, it absolutely is not.   
   >> >>>>   
   >> >>>>      So far I still find it impossible to "believe" you're honestly   
   >> >>>>      stupid   
   >> >>>>      enough   
   >> >>>> to have faith in that absurd "idea" being true, but I do consider the   
   >> >>>> possibility that you really are. So far though it still seems more   
   >> >>>> likely   
   >> >>>> that   
   >> >>>> you're more dishonest than stupid.   
   >> >>>   
   >> >>> What the fuck are you babbling about now?   
   >> >>   
   >> >>      Your mind apparently can't comprehend, so maybe you really are more   
   >> >>      stupid   
   >> >> than dishonest.   
   >> >   
   >> > What the fuck are you talking about?   
   >> >   
   >> >   
   >> >>>>>> even if every bit of that evidence is false and supports   
   >> >>>>>> something   
   >> >>>>>> that does not exist. The fact that you can't get as "far" as that   
   most   
   >> >>>>>> basic   
   >> >>>>>> of   
   >> >>>>>> starting lines is evidence of something restricting your brain from   
   >> >>>>>> getting   
   >> >>>>>> that   
   >> >>>>>> "far". Since you don't seem to be a retard and seem to have at least   
   >> >>>>>> average   
   >> >>>>>> intelligence, what is preventing you from progressing beyond the   
   moron   
   >> >>>>>> level   
   >> >>>>>> in   
   >> >>>>>> regards to the possibility of there being a God associated with this   
   >> >>>>>> planet?   
   >> >>>>>   
   >> >>>>>   
   >> >>>>> Who says I haven't considered the "possibility of there being a god   
   >> >>>>> associated with this planet"? I've considered it and realized that   
   >> >>>>> until   
   >> >>>>> provided with evidence of the existence of any god, it's a huge waste   
   >> >>>>> of   
   >> >>>>> my time to think about it any more.   
   >> >>>>   
   >> >>>>      That means you haven't done it successfully.   
   >> >>>   
   >> >>> Define "successfully" in this case.   
   >> >>   
   >> >>      In this case it would mean that you were able to do what you claim   
   to   
   >> >>      have   
   >> >> tried to do, instead of failing entirely as you obviously did IF you ever   
   >> >> honestly made the attempt. My guess is you're lying about having made the   
   >> >> attempt, but IF you did there's no doubt at all that you failed   
   >> >> completely.   
   >> >>   
   >> >> You are NOT mentally capable. You never were, and probably never will be.   
   >> >   
   >> > Now you're just confessing that you've lost the argument because you've   
   >> > resorted to complete and total nonsense.   
   >> >   
   >> >   
   >> >>>> The fact that you can't   
   >> >>>> appreciate that fact makes you even more evidence for the reason I keep   
   >> >>>> pointing   
   >> >>>> out for you.   
   >> >>>   
   >> >>> What "fact"? What "evidence"?   
   >> >>   
   >> >>      Damn you show yourself to be more and more stupid all the time.   
   >> >   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)