XPost: sac.politics, alt.atheism, alt.politics.homosexuality   
      
   On Thu, 05 Mar 2015 23:05:41 -0800, Jeanne Douglas    
   wrote:   
   .   
   >In article , mur wrote:   
   >> On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 00:42:38 -0800, Jeanne Douglas    
   >> wrote:   
   >> >In article , mur wrote:   
   >> >> On Fri, 20 Feb 2015 15:04:24 -0800, Jeanne Douglas   
   >> >>    
   >> >> wrote:   
   >   
   >   
   >> >Oh, so you do have evidence of "God's" existence. Please present it.   
   >>   
   >>     What has been presented for you in the past?   
   >   
   >Not evidence. Not ever. That's the whole point.   
      
       If there was truly no evidence there would be nothing for anyone to believe   
   in. You may honestly be too stupid to comprehend that as you are so many other   
   aspects of this topic, and if so that most certainly is a VERY significant   
   point.   
      
   >> >> The idea that if   
   >> >>     God   
   >> >> does exist and Jesus did the things recorded in the Bible, those records   
   >> >> are   
   >> >> not   
   >> >> evidence, is stupidity in the extreme.   
   >> >   
   >> >Do you have any evidence that this Jesus person ever existed? There's   
   >> >certainly none in the real world.   
   >>   
   >>     You have no idea what more evidence you wish you could pretend there   
   >>     "should   
   >> be" than what there is.   
   >   
   >Care to translate   
      
       Ihre wussings werden äußerst langweilig, während zur gleichen Zeit die   
   Tatsache zeigen, dass Sie zu dumm sind, um im Stande zu sein, umzufassen, was   
   Sie denken, dass Sie versuchen, darüber zu sprechen.   
   ...   
   >> >> The idea that if God does exist and   
   >> >> has   
   >> >> performed countless miracles that people have noticed and recorded, those   
   >> >> miracles are not evidence is also stupidity in the extreme.   
   >> >   
   >> >What the fuck are you talking about? Do you have any evidence that any   
   >> >of these miracles ever happened?   
   >>   
   >>     I've made you aware of some.   
   >   
   >That's a lie.   
      
       You're lying again.   
   ...   
   >> >> Even an atheist   
   >> >> should be able to figure that much out, but if they can't then it's more   
   >> >> evidence of their own stupidity.   
   >> >   
   >> >Still waiting for you to provide evidence of ANYthing.   
   >>   
   >>     That lie is more evidence of you being evidence.   
   >   
   >More gibberish.   
      
       You're either too stupid to be able to comprehend or you're pretending to   
   be   
   more stupid than you actually are.   
      
   >Sorry   
      
       You can't help it that you're too stupid to comprehend things other people   
   have no problem with. It's much better for you to admit it openly than try to   
   pretend you're able to comprehend things that are far beyond your terribly   
   restricted mental abilities.   
   ...   
   >> >> >People believe all kinds of insane shit, so your statement is really   
   >> >> >stupid.   
   >> >>   
   >> >>     You are evidence no matter how you try to wiggle out of it and no   
   >> >>     matter   
   >> >>     how   
   >> >> much you hate the fact that you are.   
   >> >   
   >> >I "are" what?   
   >>   
   >>     What did I point out for you?   
   >   
   >What does that question have to do with my question?   
      
       To investigate how stupid and dishonest you really are.   
      
   >Please answer my   
   >question: "I 'are' what?"   
      
       What I pointed out for you. Here's a clue for you since mentally you're so   
   horribly over-challenged:   
      
   Your clueless question of "I "are" what?" was your direct responce to what I   
   pointed out that you are.   
      
   >> >> >> >> on supposedly   
   >> >> >> >> free "thinking" human minds. YOU ARE evidence.   
   >> >> >> >   
   >> >> >> >How am I evidence?   
   >> >> >>   
   >> >> >>     It's obvious that if there truly was no evidence then there would   
   >> >> >>     be   
   >> >> >>     nothing   
   >> >> >> for anyone to believe in.   
   >> >> >   
   >> >> >Nonsense. People believe insane shti all the time.   
   >> >>   
   >> >>     Always for reasons. The reasons are evidence.   
   >> >   
   >> >Wrong again.   
   >>   
   >>     Wrong.   
   >   
   >Contradicting me doesn't make you right.   
      
       Contradicting me doesn't make you right.   
      
   >> >> You have no evidence that   
   >> >> there's no evidence, or even evidence that the evidence you lie about not   
   >> >> existing is all false.   
   >> >   
   >> >Wow, the gibberish is really getting thick.   
   >>   
   >>     You consistently show that you're a moron regarding this topic.   
   >   
   >Yes   
      
       That's because there's nothing else you could show because it's what you   
   are. You can't even pretend to be intelligent enough to really discuss this   
   topic. You might sometimes pretend to be more stupid than you actually are, but   
   you can't pretend to be LESS stupid than you actually are.   
   ...   
   >> >> The "best" you could have is your own faith in nothing   
   >> >> but a guess that it's all false, or even more stupidly possibly somehow   
   >> >> your   
   >> >> own   
   >> >> honest faith that it doesn't exist at all.   
   >> >   
   >> >And now it's complete and total world salad.   
   >> >   
   >> >Here's a thought--think about what you're trying to say and see if what   
   >> >you're typing actually gets that idea across in a sane manner.   
   >>   
   >>     Try to translate that into English.   
   >   
   >Stop speaking Gibberish.   
      
       You're either too stupid to be able to comprehend or you're pretending to   
   be   
   more stupid than you actually are. The consistency of your behavior is evidence   
   of the former.   
      
   >> >> >> Since billions of people do believe that means   
   >> >> >> there   
   >> >> >> IS evidence,   
   >> >> >   
   >> >> >Of course, it absolutely is not.   
   >> >>   
   >> >>     So far I still find it impossible to "believe" you're honestly stupid   
   >> >>     enough   
   >> >> to have faith in that absurd "idea" being true, but I do consider the   
   >> >> possibility that you really are. So far though it still seems more likely   
   >> >> that   
   >> >> you're more dishonest than stupid.   
   >> >   
   >> >What the fuck are you babbling about now?   
   >>   
   >>     Your mind apparently can't comprehend, so maybe you really are more   
   >>     stupid   
   >> than dishonest.   
   >   
   >What the fuck are you talking about?   
      
       Things that are beyond your ability to comprehend, which apparently   
   AMUSINGLY includes the fact that you can't comprehend. Hilarious!!!   
      
   >> >> >> even if every bit of that evidence is false and supports   
   >> >> >> something   
   >> >> >> that does not exist. The fact that you can't get as "far" as that most   
   >> >> >> basic   
   >> >> >> of   
   >> >> >> starting lines is evidence of something restricting your brain from   
   >> >> >> getting   
   >> >> >> that   
   >> >> >> "far". Since you don't seem to be a retard and seem to have at least   
   >> >> >> average   
   >> >> >> intelligence, what is preventing you from progressing beyond the moron   
   >> >> >> level   
   >> >> >> in   
   >> >> >> regards to the possibility of there being a God associated with this   
   >> >> >> planet?   
   >> >> >   
   >> >> >   
   >> >> >Who says I haven't considered the "possibility of there being a god   
   >> >> >associated with this planet"? I've considered it and realized that until   
   >> >> >provided with evidence of the existence of any god, it's a huge waste of   
   >> >> >my time to think about it any more.   
   >> >>   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)