XPost: sac.politics, alt.atheism, alt.politics.homosexuality
XPost: rec.arts.tv
From: kerry@heinz.com
In article <4uednQFUoql4oJ7InZ2dnUU7-L-dnZ2d@earthlink.com>
Bill Steele wrote:
>
> On 3/12/15 5:59 PM, Jeanne Douglas wrote:
> > In article , mur <> wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, 05 Mar 2015 23:10:48 -0800, Jeanne Douglas
> >> wrote:
> >> .
> >>> In article , mur wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On Sat, 28 Feb 2015 01:11:31 -0800, Jeanne Douglas
> >>>>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>> .
> >>>>> In article <6100d646e56f3a56945d8feb86f3cea3@dizum.com>,
> >>>>> "Carmine" wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> In article
> >>>>>> Mitchell Holman wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> mur wrote in news:gcqveahsh60t4eggnur0t96k60ocq57g9r@4ax.com:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Fri, 20 Feb 2015 16:45:13 -0600, Mitchell Holman
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> wrote: .
> >>>>>>>>> mur wrote in news:5iafeah6t3his33euknmf31kdqkhokde4i@4ax.com:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 14 Feb 2015 20:52:56 -0600, Mitchell Holman
> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: .
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 14 Feb 2015 20:49:17 -0500, mur wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 17:41:18 -0600, Mitchell Holman
> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: .
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> mur wrote in news:dl4ldalk1uqlcf3qnh8f4e5hhp8n28a1ul@4ax.com:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 05 Feb 2015 15:44:43 -0600, Mitchell Holman
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Here's a fact for you: Atheists have nothing at all
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> constraining them in any
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> way.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Which means their morality is independent
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of any system of divine rewards or punishments.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sounds like a superior form to me.......
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> How does lying that there's no evidence of God's
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> existence
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> sound better to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> you than not lying about it and dealing with what evidence
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> there
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> is?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> What evidence is that?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Life itself is evidence.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Life is evidence of life.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Even IF humans eventually are able to produce life from
> >>>>>>>>>> lifeless
> >>>>>>>>>> material
> >>>>>>>>>> life might STILL remain evidence of God's existence.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> "Might"?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Your whole faith is based on what MIGHT be evidence?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I don't have faith that there's a God associated with Earth.
> >>>>>>>> I'm a
> >>>>>>>> weak
> >>>>>>>> agnostic so I consider the possibility that there is not, and also
> >>>>>>>> that there is. What I pointed out is still a fact though. Is there
> >>>>>>>> something you don't like about it, and if so, how would you rather
> >>>>>>>> things be different?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> What you accept on faith is your business.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Then why are you atheists always sticking your nose up the arses
> >>>>>> of Christians?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> They invade our home newsgroup.
> >>>>
> >>>> We challenge your claims and beliefs to see if there's anything of
> >>>> value
> >>>> to
> >>>> them. So far there doesn't appear to be, which we also point out for you
> >>>> but
> >>>> you
> >>>> can't appreciate that aspect of it. From there we consider why that
might
> >>>> be...
> >>>>
> >>>>> What do you think
> >>>>
> >>>> I seems somewhat significant that all of you people can't do any
> >>>> better
> >>>> than
> >>>> you're able to against a much smaller number.
> >>>>
> >>>>> we shouldn't defend our home turf against invaders?
> >>>>
> >>>> There's one particular challenge that has totally defeated every
one
> >>>> of
> >>>> you
> >>>> for months now both as individuals and as a group. If any of you were
able
> >>>> to
> >>>> give a respectable answer to the challenge it would suggest that you
> >>>> people
> >>>> might have some idea what you think you're trying to talk about. But so
> >>>> far
> >>>> not
> >>>> one of you has been able to provide any respectable responce to it. Here
> >>>> it
> >>>> is
> >>>> again, in case any of you can finally provide one:
> >>>>
> >>>> Try to explain WHAT type of evidence you think there should be, WHERE
you
> >>>> think
> >>>> it should be, WHY you think it should be available to humans, and WHEN
you
> >>>> think
> >>>> it should have been or should be made available, if there truly is a God
> >>>> associated with this planet.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> We've answered your "challenge" every single time you've posed it.
> >>
> >> That's a horribly blatant lie.
> >>
> >>> It's not our fault that you don't like our answer.
> >>
> >> On the VERY FEW times anyone has made any attempt to answer it has
> >> usually
> >> been that they think God should regrow limbs on amputees, which is
incredibly
> >> stupid
> >
> > Why do you hate amputees?
> >
>
> Perhaps because
Crawl back in your hole you fucking non-contributing homo.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
