XPost: alt.atheism, alt.flame.jesus.christ, alt.talk.creationism   
   XPost: sci.skeptic   
      
   On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 14:45:50 -0700, Jeanne Douglas    
   wrote:   
   .   
   >In article <7304gal026rvrmmpm1uucar13hkrkiratc@4ax.com>, mur <> wrote:   
   >   
   >> On Sat, 7 Mar 2015 14:18:52 +0100, Chicken wrote:   
   >>   
   >> >"Free Lunch"  skrev i meddelelsen   
   >> >news:b6njfathn04nscpufrfvf03s9bf4312ok1@4ax.com...   
   >> >   
   >> >(snip)   
   >> >   
   >> >> I'm sure you have never presented any evidence that any deities exist.   
   >> >> If you imagine you have, please repost it or post references to other   
   >> >> evidence.   
   >> >   
   >> >Oh shit, now you've dunnit. He'll tell you that the Bible itself is   
   >> >evidence, the fact that billions believe is evidence and all the confirmed   
   >> >miracles are evidence. The are a few more but I can't be bothered to find   
   >> >the complete list he has posted several times. You get my drift, though.   
   >> >   
   >> >>   
   >> >> >>and offer a meaningless   
   >> >> >>word salad in place of an answer.   
   >> >> >   
   >> >> >    I pointed out aspects of the position WE ALL are in that you're not   
   >> >> > able to   
   >> >> >comprehend much less appreciate...LOL...which is why it's "meaningless"   
   >> >> >to you.   
   >> >>   
   >> >> You seem to be here just to act silly.   
   >> >   
   >> >Actually, I believe his agenda is to get us to act silly by trying to   
   engage   
   >> >in dialogue with him.   
   >>   
   >>     Actually to begin with it was to find out if you people have anything   
   >> worthwhile to share. In particular if you have any good reason(s) for a   
   >> person   
   >> to put faith in the possibility that there's no God associated with this   
   >> planet   
   >> since I do take it into consideration, but also consider the possibility   
   that   
   >> there is. You people have consistently shown that you not only have nothing   
   >> worthwhile to share about that aspect, but that you're not capable of giving   
   >> it   
   >> as much thought as I do myself.   
   >   
   >Yep. We're not insane.   
   >   
   >   
   >> Then you've gone on to show that you can't   
   >> even   
   >> defend your own claims and ideas,   
   >   
   >What "claims   
      
       You've claimed that none of the evidence that has persuaded billions of   
   people to believe God exists, does exist. That's probably your most stupid   
   claim.   
      
   >and ideas" are you claiming we can't defend?   
      
       You seem to believe that if God does exist there should be some verifiable   
   evidence of it, but you have no idea what it should be or how it could possibly   
   be verified. That's one of your most stupid ideas and you certainly can't make   
   any respectable attempt to defend it. NONE OF YOU can!!!   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)