XPost: alt.atheism, alt.flame.jesus.christ, alt.talk.creationism   
   XPost: sci.skeptic   
      
   On Fri, 13 Mar 2015 17:36:25 -0400, Ralph  wrote:   
   .   
   >On 3/12/2015 5:09 PM, mur wrote:   
   >> On Sat, 7 Mar 2015 14:18:52 +0100, Chicken wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> "Free Lunch"  skrev i meddelelsen   
   >>> news:b6njfathn04nscpufrfvf03s9bf4312ok1@4ax.com...   
   >>>   
   >>> (snip)   
   >>>   
   >>>> I'm sure you have never presented any evidence that any deities exist.   
   >>>> If you imagine you have, please repost it or post references to other   
   >>>> evidence.   
   >>> Oh shit, now you've dunnit. He'll tell you that the Bible itself is   
   >>> evidence, the fact that billions believe is evidence and all the confirmed   
   >>> miracles are evidence. The are a few more but I can't be bothered to find   
   >>> the complete list he has posted several times. You get my drift, though.   
   >>>   
   >>>>>> and offer a meaningless   
   >>>>>> word salad in place of an answer.   
   >>>>>     I pointed out aspects of the position WE ALL are in that you're not   
   >>>>> able to   
   >>>>> comprehend much less appreciate...LOL...which is why it's "meaningless"   
   >>>>> to you.   
   >>>> You seem to be here just to act silly.   
   >>> Actually, I believe his agenda is to get us to act silly by trying to   
   engage   
   >>> in dialogue with him.   
   >>      Actually to begin with it was to find out if you people have anything   
   >> worthwhile to share. In particular if you have any good reason(s) for a   
   person   
   >> to put faith in the possibility that there's no God associated with this   
   planet   
   >> since I do take it into consideration, but also consider the possibility   
   that   
   >> there is. You people have consistently shown that you not only have nothing   
   >> worthwhile to share about that aspect, but that you're not capable of   
   giving it   
   >> as much thought as I do myself. Then you've gone on to show that you can't   
   even   
   >> defend your own claims and ideas, and also that a large percentage of what   
   you   
   >> act like you believe is based on stupidity and blatant dishonesties. You   
   have   
   >> ALL gone on to clearly show that you have no idea what you think you're   
   trying   
   >> to talk about when you demand evidence of God's existence, and also that   
   none of   
   >> you can comprehend any reason why he wouldn't provide easy proof of his   
   >> existence for everyone. You people like to consider yourselves to be   
   authorities   
   >> on a topic you can't think about at all, and you display yourselves as   
   morons   
   >> regarding it when you make an attempt to, from your pov, discuss it.   
   >   
   >Thanks for playing, "mur".   
      
       Excellent example, Ralph.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)