XPost: alt.atheism, alt.flame.jesus.christ, alt.talk.creationism   
   XPost: sci.skeptic   
      
   On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 14:40:25 -0700, Jeanne Douglas    
   wrote:   
   .   
   >On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 17:10:33 -0400, mur <> wrote:   
   >   
   >>On Thu, 05 Mar 2015 23:12:12 -0800, Jeanne Douglas    
   >>wrote:   
   >>.   
   >>>In article , mur wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 00:29:39 -0800, Jeanne Douglas    
   >>>> wrote:   
   >>>> .   
   >>>> >In article , mur wrote:   
   >>>> >   
   >>>> >> On Mon, 23 Feb 2015 14:04:35 -0700, A Nony Mouse  wrote:   
   >>>> >>   
   >>>> >> >In article , grabber    
   wrote:   
   >>>> >> >   
   >>>> >> >   
   >>>> >> >   
   >>>> >> >>        If a person can only consider the possibility that there's no   
   >>>> >> >>        God   
   >>>> >> >> associated with Earth, and can't consider the possibility that there   
   >>>> >> >> is,   
   >>>> >> >> then   
   >>>> >> >> the person can only "have" the one possible belief. HOW would you   
   like   
   >>>> >> >> to   
   >>>> >> >> try   
   >>>> >> >> pretending that fact is not true? WHY do you want to pretend it's   
   not   
   >>>> >> >> true, do   
   >>>> >> >> you have any idea at all about that?   
   >>>> >> >   
   >>>> >> >       If a person can only consider the possibility that there is a   
   God   
   >>>> >> >associated with Earth, and can't consider the possibility that there   
   >>>> >> >isn't, then the person can only "have" the one possible belief.   
   >>>> >>   
   >>>> >>     True.   
   >>>> >>   
   >>>> >> >HOW   
   >>>> >> >would you like to try pretending that fact is not true?   
   >>>> >>   
   >>>> >>     I wouldn't. I'm more comfortable with the truth than you atheists   
   are.   
   >>>> >   
   >>>> >What "truth" are you talking about?   
   >>>>   
   >>>>     When you can't figure out what people are talking about then it's   
   beyond   
   >>>> your mental ability to comprehend.   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>Why didn't you answer my question?   
   >>   
   >>    Because you've shown that you can't comprehend much MUCH less appreciate   
   >>what the answer is.   
   >   
   >If that were true, you'd post the answer   
      
       Only if that's what I felt like doing.   
      
   >so fast our heads would spin   
   >because it would give you the chance to prove that I'm incompetent.   
      
       You've already proven that by asking a question when the answer has been   
   right in front of you the whole time.   
      
   >But since you won't answer, it's absolutely proof that you cannot answer   
   >the question.   
      
       That's a blatant lie, and a very stupid one even for you.   
      
   >Which means I win.   
      
       You exposed your own incompetence and dishonesty again, which seems to be   
   what you're here to do.   
      
   >Will you answer the question now?   
      
       As proof of your stupid blatant lie above I will. At the particular time   
   you   
   couldn't figure out what we were talking about, we were talking about the truth   
   that: If a person can only consider the possibility that there is a God   
   associated with Earth, and can't consider the possibility that there isn't,   
   then   
   the person can only "have" the one possible belief.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)