XPost: alt.atheism   
      
   On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 14:58:13 -0700, Jeanne Douglas    
   wrote:   
   .   
   >On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 17:11:14 -0400, mur <> wrote:   
   >   
   >>On Mon, 9 Mar 2015 16:38:46 +0100, Chicken wrote:   
   >>.   
   >>>"felix_unger"  skrev i meddelelsen news:cm43h4Fi5ngU1@mid.individual.net...   
   >>>   
   >>>(snip)   
   >>>   
   >>>> > And the existence of a god is a more real possibility than the existence   
   >>>> > of   
   >>>> > Dog Heads?   
   >>>> >   
   >>>> >   
   >>>>   
   >>>> It would seem so.. ...   
   >>>   
   >>>Why? What makes the difference?   
   >>>   
   >>>> ... at least to anyone who is not biased and/or prejudiced.   
   >>>   
   >>>On the contrary. You have to be biased or prejudiced to herald one as more   
   >>>plausible than the other, considering that they are basically the same   
   >>>phenomenon, the only difference being the number of people who believe in   
   >>>them.   
   >>   
   >>    That's because there's a lot more evidence for God's existence than   
   there is   
   >>for the dog heads, even though you atheists lie that there is none at all.   
   Lying   
   >>that the evidence which persuades billions to believe does not exist doesn't   
   >>make it vanish though. If it did, then there would have been no new believers   
   >>since the fist time an atheist told that lie.   
   >   
   >Presenting facts is not lying   
      
       And AFAWK everything I pointed out above is obvious fact.   
      
   >>And also all previous believers might have ceased to believe as well.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)