XPost: sac.politics, can.politics, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.politics.homosexuality   
      
   On Tue, 31 Mar 2015 23:08:50 -0700, Jeanne Douglas    
   wrote:   
   .   
   >In article , mur. <> wrote:   
   >   
   >> On Thu, 26 Mar 2015 03:19:40 -0700, Jeanne Douglas    
   >> wrote:   
   >> .   
   >> >On Wed, 25 Mar 2015 21:33:27 -0400, mur. <> wrote:   
   >> >   
   >> >>On Thu, 19 Mar 2015 05:04:44 -0700, Jeanne Douglas   
   >> >>   
   >> >>wrote:   
   >> >>.   
   >> >>>In article ,   
   >> >>> David Johnston  wrote:   
   >> >>>   
   >> >>>> On 3/18/2015 5:11 PM, mur wrote:   
   >> >>>>   
   >> >>>> >> I prefer the gigantic cow hypothesis.   
   >> >>>> >   
   >> >>>> >      One absolute consistency is that you atheists can only   
   "consider"   
   >> >>>> >      the   
   >> >>>> > possibility of God's existence in very childlike ways, but never in   
   >> >>>> > any   
   >> >>>> > realistic ways.Of course that is significant since if you could think   
   >> >>>> > of it   
   >> >>>> > in   
   >> >>>> > any realistic way you wouldn't be restricted to an atheist way of   
   >> >>>> > thinking,   
   >> >>>>   
   >> >>>> Your assumption that I am "restricted" to an atheist way of thinking is   
   >> >>>> false.   
   >> >>>   
   >> >>>   
   >> >>>What the fuck is "an atheist way of thinking"?   
   >> >>   
   >> >>    LOL....you really can't figure out a damn thing.   
   >> >   
   >> >Why didn't you answer my question?   
   >>   
   >>     Before reading your post I predicted it would be either some sort of   
   >>     blatant   
   >> lie, or more of you revealing that you can't comprehend what's being   
   >> discussed.   
   >   
   >Who says I don't comprehend?   
      
       You show that you can't.   
      
   >I expect you to say exactly what you mean   
   >instead of obfuscating.   
      
       The possibility of God's existence is beyond your mental ability to   
   consider   
   in any realistic ways. You're also giving the clear impression that other   
   things   
   associated with that possibility are beyond your ability to comprehend as well.   
   So no matter how they're presented to you, they are beyond your ability to   
   comprehend much less discuss in detail.   
      
   >> We'll if you can deal with it after I point out some basics.   
   >>   
   >> 1. Strong atheism is the belief that there is no god associated with this   
   >> planet   
   >> and may or may not be that there is no type of god associated with any   
   >> place(s)   
   >> in "the" universe, depending on the personal belief of the individual.   
   >>   
   >> 2. Weak atheism is having no belief about whether or not there is any god   
   >> associated with any place(s) in "the" universe, which would necessarily   
   >> involve   
   >> giving consideration to the possibility that there may be as well as that   
   >> there   
   >> is not if a person has been exposed to the idea.   
   >   
   >And where is the "atheist way of thinking" in either of those?   
      
       Since you still can't comprehend after all the time you've spent reading   
   about it in these forums, we can see that it's another one of those things that   
   are just beyond your mental ability to understand. No matter how the ways of   
   thinking are explained for you, they apparently will always be beyond you to   
   grasp.   
      
       BUT! What would you LIKE to think is the atheist way of thinking? Or what   
   would you like to think ARE the atheist ways of thinking if you think your able   
   to consider more than one, do you have any idea about that?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)