XPost: sac.politics, can.politics, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.politics.homosexuality   
   From: David@block.net   
      
   On 4/7/2015 3:03 PM, mur wrote:   
   > On Wed, 01 Apr 2015 11:29:59 -0500, duke  wrote:   
   > .   
   >> On Tue, 31 Mar 2015 20:02:20 -0400, mur. <> wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> On Thu, 26 Mar 2015 03:19:40 -0700, Jeanne Douglas    
   >>> wrote:   
   >>> .   
   >>>> On Wed, 25 Mar 2015 21:33:27 -0400, mur. <> wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> On Thu, 19 Mar 2015 05:04:44 -0700, Jeanne Douglas    
   >>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>> .   
   >>>>>> In article ,   
   >>>>>> David Johnston  wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> On 3/18/2015 5:11 PM, mur wrote:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> I prefer the gigantic cow hypothesis.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>       One absolute consistency is that you atheists can only   
   "consider" the   
   >>>>>>>> possibility of God's existence in very childlike ways, but never in   
   any   
   >>>>>>>> realistic ways.Of course that is significant since if you could think   
   of it   
   >>>>>>>> in   
   >>>>>>>> any realistic way you wouldn't be restricted to an atheist way of   
   thinking,   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Your assumption that I am "restricted" to an atheist way of thinking is   
   >>>>>>> false.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> What the fuck is "an atheist way of thinking"?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>     LOL....you really can't figure out a damn thing.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Why didn't you answer my question?   
   >>>   
   >>>     Before reading your post I predicted it would be either some sort of   
   blatant   
   >>> lie, or more of you revealing that you can't comprehend what's being   
   discussed.   
   >>> We'll if you can deal with it after I point out some basics.   
   >>>   
   >>> 1. Strong atheism is the belief that there is no god associated with this   
   planet   
   >>> and may or may not be that there is no type of god associated with any   
   place(s)   
   >>> in "the" universe, depending on the personal belief of the individual.   
   >>>   
   >>> 2. Weak atheism is having no belief about whether or not there is any god   
   >>> associated with any place(s) in "the" universe, which would necessarily   
   involve   
   >>> giving consideration to the possibility that there may be as well as that   
   there   
   >>> is not if a person has been exposed to the idea.   
   >>   
   >> Weak atheism is otherwise called agnosticism.   
   >   
   >      There's more to it than that. Strong agnostics believe nobody can know   
   if   
   > God exists. Weak agnostics believe it's possible that some people can know if   
   > God exists. I'm a weak agnostic.   
   >   
      
   An agnostic is normally an atheist who doesn't care to argue the point.   
   You are clearly an exception since you will argue the point endlessly.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)