XPost: sac.politics, can.politics, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.politics.homosexuality   
      
   On Tue, 07 Apr 2015 15:39:58 -0600, David Johnston  wrote:   
   .   
   >On Tue, 07 Apr 2015 17:03:53 -0400, mur wrote:   
   >   
   >>On Wed, 01 Apr 2015 11:29:59 -0500, duke  wrote:   
   >>.   
   >>>On Tue, 31 Mar 2015 20:02:20 -0400, mur. <> wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>>On Thu, 26 Mar 2015 03:19:40 -0700, Jeanne Douglas    
   >>>>wrote:   
   >>>>.   
   >>>>>On Wed, 25 Mar 2015 21:33:27 -0400, mur. <> wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>>On Thu, 19 Mar 2015 05:04:44 -0700, Jeanne Douglas    
   >>>>>>wrote:   
   >>>>>>.   
   >>>>>>>In article ,   
   >>>>>>> David Johnston  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> On 3/18/2015 5:11 PM, mur wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> >> I prefer the gigantic cow hypothesis.   
   >>>>>>>> >   
   >>>>>>>> >      One absolute consistency is that you atheists can only   
   "consider" the   
   >>>>>>>> > possibility of God's existence in very childlike ways, but never in   
   any   
   >>>>>>>> > realistic ways.Of course that is significant since if you could   
   think of it   
   >>>>>>>> > in   
   >>>>>>>> > any realistic way you wouldn't be restricted to an atheist way of   
   thinking,   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Your assumption that I am "restricted" to an atheist way of thinking   
   is   
   >>>>>>>> false.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>What the fuck is "an atheist way of thinking"?   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>    LOL....you really can't figure out a damn thing.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>Why didn't you answer my question?   
   >>>>   
   >>>>    Before reading your post I predicted it would be either some sort of   
   blatant   
   >>>>lie, or more of you revealing that you can't comprehend what's being   
   discussed.   
   >>>>We'll if you can deal with it after I point out some basics.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>1. Strong atheism is the belief that there is no god associated with this   
   planet   
   >>>>and may or may not be that there is no type of god associated with any   
   place(s)   
   >>>>in "the" universe, depending on the personal belief of the individual.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>2. Weak atheism is having no belief about whether or not there is any god   
   >>>>associated with any place(s) in "the" universe, which would necessarily   
   involve   
   >>>>giving consideration to the possibility that there may be as well as that   
   there   
   >>>>is not if a person has been exposed to the idea.   
   >>>   
   >>>Weak atheism is otherwise called agnosticism.   
   >>   
   >>    There's more to it than that. Strong agnostics believe nobody can know if   
   >>God exists. Weak agnostics believe it's possible that some people can know if   
   >>God exists. I'm a weak agnostic.   
   >   
   >An agnostic is normally an atheist who doesn't care to argue the point.   
   >You are clearly an exception since you will argue the point endlessly.   
      
       I'm an actual weak agnostic which necessarily involves considering the   
   possibility that there is a God associated with Earth, and other things all of   
   which are beyond the consideration of some other people.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)