XPost: alt.atheism
On Wed, 08 Apr 2015 06:08:10 -0700, Jeanne Douglas
wrote:
>On Tue, 07 Apr 2015 17:05:10 -0400, mur wrote:
>
>>>On Monday, March 30, 2015 at 1:57:58 PM UTC-4, Joe Bruno wrote:
>>>> On Sunday, March 29, 2015 at 7:02:54 PM UTC-7, hhya...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>> > On Monday, March 30, 2015 at 3:20:27 AM UTC+8, Joe Bruno wrote:
>>>> > > These cover various subjects.
>>>> > >
>>>> > > 1)Who was the first to discover microorganisms?
>>>> >
>>>> > The first human.
>>>> > >
>>>> > > 2)How many letters in the Cyrillic alphabet?
>>>> >
>>>> > 8, as in Cyrillic.
>>>> > >
>>>> > > 3)Name two Semitic languages
>>>> >
>>>> > Egyptian and Arabic
>>>> > >
>>>> > > 4)In what year was the nation of Pakistan created?
>>>> >
>>>> > When it became independent.
>>>> > >
>>>> > > 5)What year was the Franco-Prussian War fought?
>>>> >
>>>> > Before WWI
>>>> > >
>>>> > > 6)Who was Christopher Columbus patron when he sailed to the New World?
>>>> >
>>>> > King of Scotland
>>>> > >
>>>> > > 7)Who defeated Russia in 1905?
>>>> >
>>>> > Poland.
>>>> > >
>>>> > > 8)Who invented the artificial heart?
>>>> >
>>>> > Artificial heart did not work
>>>> > >
>>>> > > 9)Name the 4 chambers of the human heart
>>>> >
>>>> > North, South, East and West chamber.
>>>> > >
>>>> > > 10)What does the pancreas do?
>>>> >
>>>> > To help Bruno in getting less sick.
>>>>
>>>> ROTFL! Only people who have diabetes have pancreas trouble.
>>>
>>>You've obviously never heard of pancreatic cancer.
>>>
>>>Already you are messing up your new quizzes.
>>>> > >
>>>> > > 11)Why is jet fuel cheaper than avgas?
>>>> >
>>>> > Because it must be lighter for the jet to carry.
>>>> > >
>>>> > > 12)Name the advantages of Diesel engines over gasoline engines
>>>> >
>>>> > Diesel has better energy per unit?
>>>>
>>>> I said the engine, not the fuel.
>>>> > >
>>>> > > 13)What is seawater used for in marine steam engines?
>>>> >
>>>> > Because the engine needs salt?
>>>> > >
>>>> > > 14)How do vaccines protect against viruses?
>>>> >
>>>> > Just the same as Putin judo Obama
>>>> > >
>>>> > > 15)Name 5 psychotropic medications
>>>> >
>>>> > You mean one tranquilizer is not enough for Bruno?
>>>> > The we can give you 10....
>>>>
>>>> I don't take tranquilizers.
>>>>
>>>> Congrats! You failed all of them.
>>>>
>>>> I posted one of my quizzes on Stormfront and one of the White
Nationalists got 7 right out of ten. That means the racists there are better
educated than all the atheists here.HAHAHAHAHA!
>>
>> I've been presenting a challenge that atheists should be able to explain
>>very easily, yet not a single on of them has been able to provide a
respectable
>>answer. Atheists VERY frequently lie that there is no evidence of God's
>>existence, and very frequently demand that evidence be provided. Since if
there
>>truly were NO evidence there would be nothing for anyone to believe in, so
the
>>fact that there are billions of believers shows that atheists have to be
lying
>>when they make their claim. Though that alone is bad enough their cluelesness
>>and ineptitude don't end there. Since they so frequently demand evidence and
>>don't like the evidence we already have, it seems they must be imagining some
>>sort of evidence they think should be available to humans if there is a God
>>associated with Earth. Since they often demand "verifiable evidence", even
>>though they're ashamed to admit it they make it clear they're really
demanding
>>some sort of proof. It would be moronic for them to expect there to be some
and
>>moronic for them to demand it if they didn't have any idea what they thought
>>they were trying to talk about. So to find out whether they are moronic about
>>this aspect of the situation or not I presented them with the following
>>challenge to learn whether or not any of them have any idea at all:
>>
>>WHAT sort of evidence do they think should exist, WHERE do they think it
should
>>be, WHY do they think God should provide us with it, and WHEN do they think
he
>>should provide it or should have provided it?
>>
>>As yet not a single one of them has been able to make a respectable reply to
>>what should be an easy challenge for them IF they had any idea what they
think
>>they're trying to talk about. A couple of them suggested that God should
appear
>>to people in a particular form they dreamed up at a particular place and time
>>they dreamed up, but of course that's not only not respectable but is very
>>stupid and childlike. Several more of them said God should re-grow limbs on
>>amputees as proof, which again is stupid and childlike. If limbs did re-grow
on
>>humans it would be no more evidence of his existence than that they re-grow
on
>>any other creatures, or that broken bones mend. So not only are they unable
to
>>answer questions like the ones you challenged them with, but they're not even
>>able to explain what's going on between their own ears.
>
>There isn't.
So far that's what you people have shown to be the case.
>Not one person has ever provided any objective and
>verifiable evidence that any god exists.
Though you're ashamed to admit it you mean proof. Of course why you're
ashamed of it remains somewhat in question, and none of you have ever been able
to explain why you're ashamed to admit it. That on top of the facts I pointed
out above. There is evidence or there would be nothing for anyone to believe
in.
There is no proof and if you weren't horribly closed minded you would consider
why there is evidence, but there is no proof. That's a basic starting line,
none
of you have ever been able to get as "far" as.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
