XPost: sac.politics, can.politics, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.politics.homosexuality   
   From: David@block.net   
      
   On 4/18/2015 7:24 AM, duke wrote:   
   > On Fri, 10 Apr 2015 19:07:02 -0600, David Johnston  wrote:   
   >   
   >> On 4/10/2015 2:14 PM, duke wrote:   
   >>> On Thu, 09 Apr 2015 14:32:02 -0600, David Johnston  wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> On 4/9/2015 5:28 AM, duke wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> Too much hair splitting.  Evidence exists for the presence of God - it   
   can't be   
   >>>>> denied.  One may not like it, but none the less, it stares them in the   
   face,   
   >>>>> hence:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> An atheist denies   
   >>>>   
   >>>> I see that you regard consistency as too much trouble to bother with.   
   >>>   
   >>> You see wrong.  I'm highly consistent.   
   >>   
   >> Either it can't be denied, or atheists deny it.  Pick one.   
   >   
   > The item that nails the supposed atheist is that he rejects evidence we see.   
      
   Yeah.  I've seen a bible too.  But Harry Potter was a more fun read.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)