XPost: alt.atheism   
   From: malte_runz@forgitit.dk   
      
   "felix_unger"  skrev i meddelelsen news:cpgvv7Fj4dkU1@mid.individual.net...   
   >   
   > On 01-April-2015 5:12 PM, Jeanne Douglas wrote:   
      
   (snip)   
      
   > > How many times do we have to tell you that the evidence must be   
   > > objective and VERIFIABLE before you understand what we're saying? Or are   
   > > you being deliberately obtuse?   
   > >   
   >   
   > that's only talking about the nature of the evidence. evidence does NOT   
   > have to be objective and verifiable to be evidence. ...   
      
      
   An example:   
      
   A person tells you that, on the previous night, he was abducted by   
   lizzard-like aliens and taken to another dimension and probed.   
      
   What is that evidence off? (There will be follow-up questions.)   
      
      
   > ... this has been explained many times here.   
      
   It has also been rebutted every time, and, as we shall see in case you play   
   along, it will be again.   
      
   (NG's trimmed)   
      
   --   
   Malte Runz   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)