XPost: alt.atheism   
   From: malte_runz@forgitit.dk   
      
   "felix_unger"  skrev i meddelelsen news:cphnkeFp47uU1@mid.individual.net...   
   >   
   > On 19-April-2015 9:48 PM, Malte Runz wrote:   
   > > "felix_unger"  skrev i meddelelsen   
   > > news:cpgvv7Fj4dkU1@mid.individual.net...   
   > >>   
   > >> On 01-April-2015 5:12 PM, Jeanne Douglas wrote:   
   > >   
   > > (snip)   
   > >   
   > >> > How many times do we have to tell you that the evidence must be   
   > >> > objective and VERIFIABLE before you understand what we're saying?   
   > >> Or are   
   > >> > you being deliberately obtuse?   
   > >> >   
   > >>   
   > >> that's only talking about the nature of the evidence. evidence does NOT   
   > >> have to be objective and verifiable to be evidence. ...   
   > >   
   > >   
      
   An example:   
      
   A person tells you that, on the previous night, he was abducted by   
   lizzard-like aliens and taken to another dimension and probed.   
      
   What is that evidence off? (There will be follow-up questions.)   
      
   (snip)   
      
   --   
   Malte Runz   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)