XPost: sac.politics, can.politics, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.politics.homosexuality   
      
   On Sun, 19 Apr 2015 10:06:43 -0400, "M.I.Wakefield"  wrote:   
   .   
   >"felix_unger"  wrote in message news:cpgvv7Fj4dkU1@mid.individual.net...   
   >   
   >> that's only talking about the nature of the evidence. evidence does NOT   
   >> have to be objective and verifiable to be evidence.   
   >   
   >If it is not objective, and not verifiable, then it's an opinion.   
      
       You people have no clue what sort of evidence you think there should be if   
   God exists, where you think it should be, why he should provided it, or when he   
   should or should have provided it. AND you can't imagine how you think it   
   should   
   be verifiable either of course. You have no idea what you think you're   
   demanding, and no reason to think it should be available. LOL...your position   
   really is hilarious. Pathetic, but still hilarious.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)