XPost: sac.politics, can.politics, alt.atheism
XPost: alt.politics.homosexuality
On Fri, 17 Apr 2015 18:55:08 -0600, David Johnston wrote:
.
>On 4/17/2015 2:46 PM, mur wrote:
>> On Tue, 07 Apr 2015 15:39:58 -0600, David Johnston wrote:
>> .
>>> On Tue, 07 Apr 2015 17:03:53 -0400, mur wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, 01 Apr 2015 11:29:59 -0500, duke wrote:
>>>> .
>>>>> On Tue, 31 Mar 2015 20:02:20 -0400, mur. <> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, 26 Mar 2015 03:19:40 -0700, Jeanne Douglas
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> .
>>>>>>> On Wed, 25 Mar 2015 21:33:27 -0400, mur. <> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, 19 Mar 2015 05:04:44 -0700, Jeanne Douglas
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>> In article ,
>>>>>>>>> David Johnston wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 3/18/2015 5:11 PM, mur wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I prefer the gigantic cow hypothesis.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> One absolute consistency is that you atheists can only
"consider" the
>>>>>>>>>>> possibility of God's existence in very childlike ways, but never
in any
>>>>>>>>>>> realistic ways.Of course that is significant since if you could
think of it
>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>> any realistic way you wouldn't be restricted to an atheist way of
thinking,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Your assumption that I am "restricted" to an atheist way of
thinking is
>>>>>>>>>> false.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> What the fuck is "an atheist way of thinking"?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> LOL....you really can't figure out a damn thing.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Why didn't you answer my question?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Before reading your post I predicted it would be either some sort
of blatant
>>>>>> lie, or more of you revealing that you can't comprehend what's being
discussed.
>>>>>> We'll if you can deal with it after I point out some basics.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1. Strong atheism is the belief that there is no god associated with
this planet
>>>>>> and may or may not be that there is no type of god associated with any
place(s)
>>>>>> in "the" universe, depending on the personal belief of the individual.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2. Weak atheism is having no belief about whether or not there is any
god
>>>>>> associated with any place(s) in "the" universe, which would necessarily
involve
>>>>>> giving consideration to the possibility that there may be as well as
that there
>>>>>> is not if a person has been exposed to the idea.
>>>>>
>>>>> Weak atheism is otherwise called agnosticism.
>>>>
>>>> There's more to it than that. Strong agnostics believe nobody can
know if
>>>> God exists. Weak agnostics believe it's possible that some people can
know if
>>>> God exists. I'm a weak agnostic.
>>>
>>> An agnostic is normally an atheist who doesn't care to argue the point.
>>> You are clearly an exception since you will argue the point endlessly.
>>
>> I'm an actual weak agnostic which necessarily involves considering the
>> possibility that there is a God associated with Earth, and other things all
of
>> which are beyond the consideration of some other people.
>>
>
>Hell I "consider" that.
Try providing evidence that you can by showing us how you can do it.
>But since I only consider it and don't believe
>it, I'm an atheist.
As yet there's no reason for anyone to believe you can consider it. Even if
you eventually are able to provide evidence that you can you could still be a
weak agnostic rather than the weak atheist you want people to believe you are.
When you never are able to provide any though, you will remain appearing to be
a
strong atheist who is ashamed of his own faith that there's no God associated
with this planet, or probably any other place(s) in the universe.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
