XPost: sac.politics, can.politics, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.politics.homosexuality   
   From: David@block.net   
      
   On 4/29/2015 5:58 PM, mur wrote:   
   > On Mon, 20 Apr 2015 15:45:06 -0500, duke  wrote:   
   > .   
   >> On Sat, 18 Apr 2015 17:58:32 -0600, David Johnston  wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> On 4/18/2015 7:24 AM, duke wrote:   
   >>>> On Fri, 10 Apr 2015 19:07:02 -0600, David Johnston    
   wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> On 4/10/2015 2:14 PM, duke wrote:   
   >>>>>> On Thu, 09 Apr 2015 14:32:02 -0600, David Johnston    
   wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> On 4/9/2015 5:28 AM, duke wrote:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Too much hair splitting.  Evidence exists for the presence of God -   
   it can't be   
   >>>>>>>> denied.  One may not like it, but none the less, it stares them in   
   the face,   
   >>>>>>>> hence:   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> An atheist denies   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> I see that you regard consistency as too much trouble to bother with.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> You see wrong.  I'm highly consistent.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Either it can't be denied, or atheists deny it.  Pick one.   
   >>   
   >>>> The item that nails the supposed atheist is that he rejects evidence we   
   see.   
   >>> Yeah.  I've seen a bible too.  But Harry Potter was a more fun read.   
   >>   
   >> But not any truth at all.  Unless you think you can ride a broom stick.   
   >   
   >      These people can't distinguish between things we know are fiction and   
   things   
   > no one could know are fiction.   
      
   Really?  So we can't know that there was no world wide flood that wiped   
   out all life on land some four thousand years ago?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)