XPost: sac.politics, can.politics, alt.atheism
XPost: alt.politics.homosexuality
On Wed, 29 Apr 2015 21:11:05 -0700, Jeanne Douglas
wrote:
.
>In article , mur wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 20 Apr 2015 15:45:06 -0500, duke wrote:
>> .
>> >On Sat, 18 Apr 2015 17:58:32 -0600, David Johnston wrote:
>> >
>> >>On 4/18/2015 7:24 AM, duke wrote:
>> >>> On Fri, 10 Apr 2015 19:07:02 -0600, David Johnston
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> On 4/10/2015 2:14 PM, duke wrote:
>> >>>>> On Thu, 09 Apr 2015 14:32:02 -0600, David Johnston
>> >>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>> On 4/9/2015 5:28 AM, duke wrote:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Too much hair splitting. Evidence exists for the presence of God -
>> >>>>>>> it can't be
>> >>>>>>> denied. One may not like it, but none the less, it stares them in
>> >>>>>>> the face,
>> >>>>>>> hence:
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> An atheist denies
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> I see that you regard consistency as too much trouble to bother with.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> You see wrong. I'm highly consistent.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Either it can't be denied, or atheists deny it. Pick one.
>> >
>> >>> The item that nails the supposed atheist is that he rejects evidence we
>> >>> see.
>> >>Yeah. I've seen a bible too. But Harry Potter was a more fun read.
>> >
>> >But not any truth at all. Unless you think you can ride a broom stick.
>>
>> These people can't distinguish between things we know are fiction and
>> things
>> no one could know are fiction.
>
>Let's have examples of "things no one could know are fiction". 3-5
>examples would be a good start.
Any of the miracles Jesus was said to have performed, including rising from
the dead, etc.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
