XPost: alt.atheism   
      
   On Thu, 30 Apr 2015 07:18:05 -0400, "Tim"  wrote:   
   .   
   >"mur" wrote in message news:5is2kapvhqdpvus3kv339k62dg990u6pdi@4ax.com...   
   >> On Sat, 18 Apr 2015 04:29:36 -0700, Jeanne Douglas   
   >>    
   >> wrote:   
   >> .   
   >>>In article <6as2jaldhjjmcjhpak2ek78djle21f75kp@4ax.com>, mur wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> On Wed, 08 Apr 2015 06:08:10 -0700, Jeanne Douglas   
   >>>>    
   >>>> wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>> >On Tue, 07 Apr 2015 17:05:10 -0400, mur wrote:   
   >>>> >   
   >>>> >>>On Monday, March 30, 2015 at 1:57:58 PM UTC-4, Joe Bruno wrote:   
   >>>> >>>> On Sunday, March 29, 2015 at 7:02:54 PM UTC-7, hhya...@gmail.com   
   >>>> >>>> wrote:   
   >>>> >>>> > On Monday, March 30, 2015 at 3:20:27 AM UTC+8, Joe Bruno wrote:   
   >>>> >>>> > > These cover various subjects.   
   >>>> >>>> > >   
   >>>> >>>> > > 1)Who was the first to discover microorganisms?   
   >>>> >>>> >   
   >>>> >>>> > The first human.   
   >>>> >>>> > >   
   >>>> >>>> > > 2)How many letters in the Cyrillic alphabet?   
   >>>> >>>> >   
   >>>> >>>> > 8, as in Cyrillic.   
   >>>> >>>> > >   
   >>>> >>>> > > 3)Name two Semitic languages   
   >>>> >>>> >   
   >>>> >>>> > Egyptian and Arabic   
   >>>> >>>> > >   
   >>>> >>>> > > 4)In what year was the nation of Pakistan created?   
   >>>> >>>> >   
   >>>> >>>> > When it became independent.   
   >>>> >>>> > >   
   >>>> >>>> > > 5)What year was the Franco-Prussian War fought?   
   >>>> >>>> >   
   >>>> >>>> > Before WWI   
   >>>> >>>> > >   
   >>>> >>>> > > 6)Who was Christopher Columbus patron when he sailed to the New   
   >>>> >>>> > > World?   
   >>>> >>>> >   
   >>>> >>>> > King of Scotland   
   >>>> >>>> > >   
   >>>> >>>> > > 7)Who defeated Russia in 1905?   
   >>>> >>>> >   
   >>>> >>>> > Poland.   
   >>>> >>>> > >   
   >>>> >>>> > > 8)Who invented the artificial heart?   
   >>>> >>>> >   
   >>>> >>>> > Artificial heart did not work   
   >>>> >>>> > >   
   >>>> >>>> > > 9)Name the 4 chambers of the human heart   
   >>>> >>>> >   
   >>>> >>>> > North, South, East and West chamber.   
   >>>> >>>> > >   
   >>>> >>>> > > 10)What does the pancreas do?   
   >>>> >>>> >   
   >>>> >>>> > To help Bruno in getting less sick.   
   >>>> >>>>   
   >>>> >>>> ROTFL! Only people who have diabetes have pancreas trouble.   
   >>>> >>>   
   >>>> >>>You've obviously never heard of pancreatic cancer.   
   >>>> >>>   
   >>>> >>>Already you are messing up your new quizzes.   
   >>>> >>>> > >   
   >>>> >>>> > > 11)Why is jet fuel cheaper than avgas?   
   >>>> >>>> >   
   >>>> >>>> > Because it must be lighter for the jet to carry.   
   >>>> >>>> > >   
   >>>> >>>> > > 12)Name the advantages of Diesel engines over gasoline engines   
   >>>> >>>> >   
   >>>> >>>> > Diesel has better energy per unit?   
   >>>> >>>>   
   >>>> >>>> I said the engine, not the fuel.   
   >>>> >>>> > >   
   >>>> >>>> > > 13)What is seawater used for in marine steam engines?   
   >>>> >>>> >   
   >>>> >>>> > Because the engine needs salt?   
   >>>> >>>> > >   
   >>>> >>>> > > 14)How do vaccines protect against viruses?   
   >>>> >>>> >   
   >>>> >>>> > Just the same as Putin judo Obama   
   >>>> >>>> > >   
   >>>> >>>> > > 15)Name 5 psychotropic medications   
   >>>> >>>> >   
   >>>> >>>> > You mean one tranquilizer is not enough for Bruno?   
   >>>> >>>> > The  we can give you 10....   
   >>>> >>>>   
   >>>> >>>> I don't take tranquilizers.   
   >>>> >>>>   
   >>>> >>>> Congrats! You failed all of them.   
   >>>> >>>>   
   >>>> >>>>  I posted one of my quizzes on Stormfront and one of the White   
   >>>> >>>>  Nationalists got 7 right out of ten. That means the racists there   
   >>>> >>>> are   
   >>>> >>>>  better educated than all the atheists here.HAHAHAHAHA!   
   >>>> >>   
   >>>> >>    I've been presenting a challenge that atheists should be able to   
   >>>> >>    explain   
   >>>> >>very easily, yet not a single on of them has been able to provide a   
   >>>> >>respectable   
   >>>> >>answer. Atheists VERY frequently lie that there is no evidence of   
   >>>> >>God's   
   >>>> >>existence, and very frequently demand that evidence be provided. Since   
   >>>> >>if   
   >>>> >>there   
   >>>> >>truly were NO evidence there would be nothing for anyone to believe   
   >>>> >>in, so   
   >>>> >>the   
   >>>> >>fact that there are billions of believers shows that atheists have to   
   >>>> >>be   
   >>>> >>lying   
   >>>> >>when they make their claim. Though that alone is bad enough their   
   >>>> >>cluelesness   
   >>>> >>and ineptitude don't end there. Since they so frequently demand   
   >>>> >>evidence   
   >>>> >>and   
   >>>> >>don't like the evidence we already have, it seems they must be   
   >>>> >>imagining   
   >>>> >>some   
   >>>> >>sort of evidence they think should be available to humans if there is   
   >>>> >>a God   
   >>>> >>associated with Earth. Since they often demand "verifiable evidence",   
   >>>> >>even   
   >>>> >>though they're ashamed to admit it they make it clear they're really   
   >>>> >>demanding   
   >>>> >>some sort of proof. It would be moronic for them to expect there to be   
   >>>> >>some   
   >>>> >>and   
   >>>> >>moronic for them to demand it if they didn't have any idea what they   
   >>>> >>thought   
   >>>> >>they were trying to talk about. So to find out whether they are   
   >>>> >>moronic   
   >>>> >>about   
   >>>> >>this aspect of the situation or not I presented them with the   
   >>>> >>following   
   >>>> >>challenge to learn whether or not any of them have any idea at all:   
   >>>> >>   
   >>>> >>WHAT sort of evidence do they think should exist, WHERE do they think   
   >>>> >>it   
   >>>> >>should   
   >>>> >>be, WHY do they think God should provide us with it, and WHEN do they   
   >>>> >>think   
   >>>> >>he   
   >>>> >>should provide it or should have provided it?   
   >>>> >>   
   >>>> >>As yet not a single one of them has been able to make a respectable   
   >>>> >>reply   
   >>>> >>to   
   >>>> >>what should be an easy challenge for them IF they had any idea what   
   >>>> >>they   
   >>>> >>think   
   >>>> >>they're trying to talk about. A couple of them suggested that God   
   >>>> >>should   
   >>>> >>appear   
   >>>> >>to people in a particular form they dreamed up at a particular place   
   >>>> >>and   
   >>>> >>time   
   >>>> >>they dreamed up, but of course that's not only not respectable but is   
   >>>> >>very   
   >>>> >>stupid and childlike. Several more of them said God should re-grow   
   >>>> >>limbs on   
   >>>> >>amputees as proof, which again is stupid and childlike. If limbs did   
   >>>> >>re-grow on   
   >>>> >>humans it would be no more evidence of his existence than that they   
   >>>> >>re-grow   
   >>>> >>on   
   >>>> >>any other creatures, or that broken bones mend. So not only are they   
   >>>> >>unable   
   >>>> >>to   
   >>>> >>answer questions like the ones you challenged them with, but they're   
   >>>> >>not   
   >>>> >>even   
   >>>> >>able to explain what's going on between their own ears.   
   >>>> >   
   >>>> >There isn't.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>     So far that's what you people have shown to be the case.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> >Not one person has ever provided any objective and   
   >>>> >verifiable evidence that any god exists.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>     Though you're ashamed to admit it you mean proof.   
   >>>   
   >>>Since I in no way meant proof, what do I have to be ashamed of.   
   >>   
   >>    What would you like people to believe is the difference between what   
   >> you   
   >> demand and proof?   
   >>   
   >>>> Of course why you're   
   >>>> ashamed of it remains somewhat in question, and none of you have ever   
   >>>> been   
   >>>> able   
   >>>> to explain why you're ashamed to admit it.   
   >>>   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)