XPost: sac.politics, can.politics, alt.atheism
XPost: alt.politics.homosexuality
From: David@block.net
On 5/8/2015 8:03 PM, mur wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Apr 2015 21:11:05 -0700, Jeanne Douglas
> wrote:
> .
>> In article , mur wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 20 Apr 2015 15:45:06 -0500, duke wrote:
>>> .
>>>> On Sat, 18 Apr 2015 17:58:32 -0600, David Johnston
wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 4/18/2015 7:24 AM, duke wrote:
>>>>>> On Fri, 10 Apr 2015 19:07:02 -0600, David Johnston
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 4/10/2015 2:14 PM, duke wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Thu, 09 Apr 2015 14:32:02 -0600, David Johnston
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 4/9/2015 5:28 AM, duke wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Too much hair splitting. Evidence exists for the presence of God -
>>>>>>>>>> it can't be
>>>>>>>>>> denied. One may not like it, but none the less, it stares them in
>>>>>>>>>> the face,
>>>>>>>>>> hence:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> An atheist denies
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I see that you regard consistency as too much trouble to bother with.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You see wrong. I'm highly consistent.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Either it can't be denied, or atheists deny it. Pick one.
>>>>
>>>>>> The item that nails the supposed atheist is that he rejects evidence we
>>>>>> see.
>>>>> Yeah. I've seen a bible too. But Harry Potter was a more fun read.
>>>>
>>>> But not any truth at all. Unless you think you can ride a broom stick.
>>>
>>> These people can't distinguish between things we know are fiction and
>>> things
>>> no one could know are fiction.
>>
>> Let's have examples of "things no one could know are fiction". 3-5
>> examples would be a good start.
>
> Any of the miracles Jesus was said to have performed, including rising
from
> the dead, etc.
>
What evidence do we see of that?
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
