XPost: sac.politics, can.politics, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.politics.homosexuality   
   From: dkelly@dont-email.me   
      
   In article    
   Jeanne Douglas  wrote:   
   >   
   > In article , mur. <> wrote:   
   >   
   > > On Thu, 26 Mar 2015 03:19:40 -0700, Jeanne Douglas    
   > > wrote:   
   > > .   
   > > >On Wed, 25 Mar 2015 21:33:27 -0400, mur. <> wrote:   
   > > >   
   > > >>On Thu, 19 Mar 2015 05:04:44 -0700, Jeanne Douglas   
   > > >>   
   > > >>wrote:   
   > > >>.   
   > > >>>In article ,   
   > > >>> David Johnston  wrote:   
   > > >>>   
   > > >>>> On 3/18/2015 5:11 PM, mur wrote:   
   > > >>>>   
   > > >>>> >> I prefer the gigantic cow hypothesis.   
   > > >>>> >   
   > > >>>> >      One absolute consistency is that you atheists can only   
   "consider"   
   > > >>>> >      the   
   > > >>>> > possibility of God's existence in very childlike ways, but never in   
   > > >>>> > any   
   > > >>>> > realistic ways.Of course that is significant since if you could   
   think   
   > > >>>> > of it   
   > > >>>> > in   
   > > >>>> > any realistic way you wouldn't be restricted to an atheist way of   
   > > >>>> > thinking,   
   > > >>>>   
   > > >>>> Your assumption that I am "restricted" to an atheist way of thinking   
   is   
   > > >>>> false.   
   > > >>>   
   > > >>>   
   > > >>>What the fuck is "an atheist way of thinking"?   
   > > >>   
   > > >>    LOL....you really can't figure out a damn thing.   
   > > >   
   > > >Why didn't you answer my question?   
   > >   
   > >     Before reading your post I predicted it would be either some sort of   
   > >     blatant   
   > > lie, or more of you revealing that you can't comprehend what's being   
   > > discussed.   
   >   
   > Who says I don't comprehend? I expect you to say exactly what you mean   
   > instead of obfuscating.   
      
   It's very simple.  You don't comprehend.   
      
   > > We'll if you can deal with it after I point out some basics.   
   > >   
   > > 1. Strong atheism is the belief that there is no god associated with this   
   > > planet   
   > > and may or may not be that there is no type of god associated with any   
   > > place(s)   
   > > in "the" universe, depending on the personal belief of the individual.   
   > >   
   > > 2. Weak atheism is having no belief about whether or not there is any god   
   > > associated with any place(s) in "the" universe, which would necessarily   
   > > involve   
   > > giving consideration to the possibility that there may be as well as that   
   > > there   
   > > is not if a person has been exposed to the idea.   
   >   
   >   
   > And where is the "atheist way of thinking" in either of those?   
      
   When has an atheist ever been accused of thinking?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)