XPost: sac.politics, can.politics, alt.atheism
XPost: alt.politics.homosexuality
On Sat, 09 May 2015 00:36:07 -0700, Jeanne Douglas
wrote:
>In article <7mqqka945e20dcup8atf14s0odmpbksnud@4ax.com>, mur wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 29 Apr 2015 20:45:56 -0700, Jeanne Douglas
>> wrote:
>> .
>> >In article , mur wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Sun, 19 Apr 2015 16:17:35 +1000, felix_unger wrote:
>> >> .
>> >> >On 18-April-2015 6:54 AM, mur wrote:
>> >> >> On Tue, 7 Apr 2015 18:27:00 -0400, "M.I.Wakefield"
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> ..
>> >> >>> "David Johnston" wrote in message news:mg1it3$3fd$4@dont-email.me...
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>> On 4/7/2015 3:04 PM, mur wrote:
>> >> >>>>> It means what I pointed out for you. Atheists demand
evidence,
>> >> >>>> I have not demanded any.
>> >> >>> Atheists demand evidence before they will change their minds: None
has
>> >> >>> been
>> >> >>> offered.
>> >> >> You're lying,
>> >> >
>> >> >she certainly is.
>> >>
>> >> One thing I still can't figure out is how these people feel it's
>> >> somehow
>> >> better to tell an extremely stupidly blatant lie we all know is a lie
like
>> >> that,
>> >> than to not tell it. Could they actually believe it could somehow become
>> >> true
>> >> if
>> >> they repeat it often enough?
>> >
>> >Projection is strong in this one.
>> >
>> >What "lie" are we supposed to have told?
>>
>> The lie being referred to there is of course the horribly blatant lie
>> that
>> no evidence has been offered. It seems even you shouldn't have been too
>> stupid
>> to figure that out.
>
>
>So you're saying the truth is a lie.
That's a lie.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
