XPost: sac.politics, can.politics, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.politics.homosexuality   
      
   On Sat, 09 May 2015 00:35:34 -0700, Jeanne Douglas    
   wrote:   
      
   >In article , mur wrote:   
   >   
   >> On Wed, 29 Apr 2015 21:16:48 -0700, Jeanne Douglas    
   >> wrote:   
   >>   
   >> >In article <5nr2ka9jv63o68jae8vukdtpu6qisiurpp@4ax.com>, mur wrote:   
   >> >   
   >> >> On Sat, 18 Apr 2015 04:40:56 -0700, Jeanne Douglas   
   >> >>    
   >> >> wrote:   
   >> >> .   
   >> >> >In article , mur wrote:   
   >> >> >> On Wed, 08 Apr 2015 06:09:05 -0700, Jeanne Douglas   
   >> >> >>    
   >> >> >> wrote:   
   >> >> >   
   >> >> >   
   >> >> >> >That's a lie. We tell you EXACTLY what the evidence should be.   
   >> >> >>   
   >> >> >>     That's a lie. Try doing it now. EXACTLY what do you like to think   
   >> >> >>     it   
   >> >> >>     should   
   >> >> >> be.   
   >> >> >   
   >> >> >I'm going to tell you once more time (one last time). I don't give a   
   >> >> >shit what you present as evidence; if it isn't objective and verifiable,   
   >> >> >it is not evidence.   
   >> >> >   
   >> >> >Now read that over and over until you understand what I said.   
   >> >>   
   >> >>     I know what you said, but also know that you don't have any idea how   
   >> >>     you   
   >> >> think it should be able to be verified, and you have absolutely no reason   
   >> >> to   
   >> >> believe verifiable evidence should be available if God exists.   
   >> >   
   >> >Then why would I believe in any god?   
   >>   
   >>     For most people it's a process that begins with praying for God to give   
   >>     you   
   >> reason to believe   
   >   
   >How would praying "give me reason to believe"?   
      
       That would be between you and God if he exists. It seems even an atheist   
   SHOULD be able to figure that out.   
      
   >>     Yet when I mentioned that same thing just above you acted like you   
   didn't   
   >> know what I was pointing out for you, and now you lie blatantly about it   
   >> claiming to have done something you have never been able to do or ever will   
   >> be   
   >> able to do. You mentioned at some point that you think God should regrow   
   >> limbs   
   >> immediately for amputees whenever they ask him to, but that's so incredibly   
   >> stupid   
   >   
   >Why is it stupid?   
      
       It's as stupid as saying he should give everyone anything they ask for   
   immediately. Can't you figure out why it's stupid for you to think he should do   
   that?   
      
   >> >If god doesn't want to torture people for all eternity, then it's its   
   >> >responsibility to give people the evidence they require to know it   
   >> >exists.   
   >> >   
   >> >But, of course, your god is a genocidal torturing psychopathic monster,   
   >> >so, of course, it loves the idea of torturing people for all eternity   
   >>   
   >>     May be. But I hope you're wrong about that and really believe you are.   
   >   
   >Why?   
      
       Because from my pov he wouldn't be respectable if he did that, and even   
   though things aren't "perfect" on this planet it seems that the environment is   
   "better" than on most other worlds we're aware of where there is no life at   
   all.   
   Again it seems even an atheist should be able to figure that out, though in   
   reality it appears that none of you can appreciate things like that even after   
   they've been pointed out for you.   
      
   >Wishful thinking don't cut it.   
      
       The same goes for you, even though as usual/always you atheists can't   
   figure   
   that out either.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)