XPost: sac.politics, can.politics, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.politics.homosexuality   
      
   On Sat, 09 May 2015 00:16:38 -0700, Jeanne Douglas    
   wrote:   
   .   
   >In article <9nqqka16g2v0jpntpid0nl2nhipl86hosq@4ax.com>, mur wrote:   
   >   
   >> On Wed, 29 Apr 2015 21:11:05 -0700, Jeanne Douglas    
   >> wrote:   
   >> .   
   >> >In article , mur wrote:   
   >> >   
   >> >> On Mon, 20 Apr 2015 15:45:06 -0500, duke  wrote:   
   >> >> .   
   >> >> >On Sat, 18 Apr 2015 17:58:32 -0600, David Johnston    
   >> >> >wrote:   
   >> >> >   
   >> >> >>On 4/18/2015 7:24 AM, duke wrote:   
   >> >> >>> On Fri, 10 Apr 2015 19:07:02 -0600, David Johnston    
   >> >> >>> wrote:   
   >> >> >>>   
   >> >> >>>> On 4/10/2015 2:14 PM, duke wrote:   
   >> >> >>>>> On Thu, 09 Apr 2015 14:32:02 -0600, David Johnston <   
   avid@block.net>   
   >> >> >>>>> wrote:   
   >> >> >>>>>   
   >> >> >>>>>> On 4/9/2015 5:28 AM, duke wrote:   
   >> >> >>>>>>   
   >> >> >>>>>>> Too much hair splitting.  Evidence exists for the presence of God   
   >> >> >>>>>>> -   
   >> >> >>>>>>> it can't be   
   >> >> >>>>>>> denied.  One may not like it, but none the less, it stares them   
   in   
   >> >> >>>>>>> the face,   
   >> >> >>>>>>> hence:   
   >> >> >>>>>>>   
   >> >> >>>>>>> An atheist denies   
   >> >> >>>>>>   
   >> >> >>>>>> I see that you regard consistency as too much trouble to bother   
   >> >> >>>>>> with.   
   >> >> >>>>>   
   >> >> >>>>> You see wrong.  I'm highly consistent.   
   >> >> >>>>   
   >> >> >>>> Either it can't be denied, or atheists deny it.  Pick one.   
   >> >> >   
   >> >> >>> The item that nails the supposed atheist is that he rejects evidence   
   >> >> >>> we   
   >> >> >>> see.   
   >> >> >>Yeah.  I've seen a bible too.  But Harry Potter was a more fun read.   
   >> >> >   
   >> >> >But not any truth at all.  Unless you think you can ride a broom stick.   
   >> >>   
   >> >>     These people can't distinguish between things we know are fiction and   
   >> >>     things   
   >> >> no one could know are fiction.   
   >> >   
   >> >Let's have examples of "things no one could know are fiction". 3-5   
   >> >examples would be a good start.   
   >>   
   >>     Any of the miracles Jesus was said to have performed, including rising   
   >>     from   
   >> the dead, etc.   
   >   
   >We KNOW all of that is fiction   
      
       There's no way anyone could know that. Even you SHOULD be able to   
   comprehend   
   that much.   
      
   >because there's not even one piece of   
   >evidence that any of that happened or even that Jesus ever existed.   
      
       Other than the evidence we do have, WHAT more do you think there SHOULD BE?   
   WHERE do you think it SHOULD BE? WHY do you think it SHOULD BE available? Just   
   desperately maundering that you think there should be some sort of verifiable   
   evidence somewhere for some unknown reason does NOT explain anything other than   
   to clearly show that you don't have the slightest clue what you think you're   
   trying to talk about.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)