XPost: sac.politics, can.politics, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.politics.homosexuality   
   From: David@block.net   
      
   On 5/22/2015 10:03 AM, mur wrote:   
   > On Fri, 08 May 2015 22:01:33 -0600, David Johnston  wrote:   
   > .   
   >> On 5/8/2015 8:03 PM, mur wrote:   
   >>> On Wed, 29 Apr 2015 20:49:38 -0600, David Johnston  wrote:   
   >>> .   
   >>>> On 4/29/2015 5:58 PM, mur wrote:   
   >>>>> On Mon, 20 Apr 2015 15:45:06 -0500, duke  wrote:   
   >>>>> .   
   >>>>>> On Sat, 18 Apr 2015 17:58:32 -0600, David Johnston    
   wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> On 4/18/2015 7:24 AM, duke wrote:   
   >>>>>>>> On Fri, 10 Apr 2015 19:07:02 -0600, David Johnston    
   wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> On 4/10/2015 2:14 PM, duke wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 09 Apr 2015 14:32:02 -0600, David Johnston  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> On 4/9/2015 5:28 AM, duke wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> Too much hair splitting.  Evidence exists for the presence of God   
   - it can't be   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> denied.  One may not like it, but none the less, it stares them   
   in the face,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> hence:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> An atheist denies   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> I see that you regard consistency as too much trouble to bother   
   with.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> You see wrong.  I'm highly consistent.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Either it can't be denied, or atheists deny it.  Pick one.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> The item that nails the supposed atheist is that he rejects evidence   
   we see.   
   >>>>>>> Yeah.  I've seen a bible too.  But Harry Potter was a more fun read.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> But not any truth at all.  Unless you think you can ride a broom stick.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>        These people can't distinguish between things we know are fiction   
   and things   
   >>>>> no one could know are fiction.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Really?  So we can't know that there was no world wide flood that wiped   
   >>>> out all life on land some four thousand years ago?   
   >>>   
   >>>       Sure we can.   
   >>   
   >> Then what were you referring to?   
   >   
   >      We can't know if Jesus was a virgin birth.   
      
   Does that matter when the only indication that he was a virgin birth is   
   a book that claims that all life on land was wiped out four thousand   
   years ago?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)