home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.agnosticism      A religion for those who hate religion?      213,516 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 212,320 of 213,516   
   Smiler to mur   
   Re: Theotech: God Is the Ultimate Techno   
   30 May 15 20:55:29   
   
   XPost: alt.atheism, talk.atheism   
   From: smiler@jo.king   
      
   On Fri, 29 May 2015 20:45:41 -0400, mur wrote:   
      
   > On Fri, 22 May 2015 19:30:22 +0000 (UTC), Smil wrote:   
   > .   
   >>On Fri, 22 May 2015 12:04:27 -0400, mur wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> On Sat, 9 May 2015 21:56:26 +0000 (UTC), Smil wrote:   
   >>> .   
   >>>>On Fri, 08 May 2015 22:02:27 -0400, mur wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> On Thu, 30 Apr 2015 08:39:01 -0400, raven1   
   >>>>>    
   >>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>> .   
   >>>>>>On Wed, 29 Apr 2015 23:18:42 -0400, "Chris F.A. Johnson"   
   >>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>On 2015-04-30, mur wrote:   
   >>>>>>>...   
   >>>>>>>>     The fact that there are no examples of reptiles in transition   
   >>>>>>>>     stages to   
   >>>>>>>> birds, or mammals in transition stages to flying mammals, etc,   
   >>>>>>>> alive today is evidence that something (like God) had deliberate   
   >>>>>>>> influence on evolution.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   If there are no examples, it is evidence that they either   
   >>>>>>>   haven't been found yet or that there aren't any. It says nothing   
   >>>>>>>   whatsoever about the existence of something like God or anything   
   >>>>>>>   else.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>We do have transitional fossils of reptile-to-bird evolution,   
   >>>>>>Archaeopteryx being the most celebrated. But whether we did or not,   
   >>>>>>you are correct that this is irrelevant to the existence of a deity,   
   >>>>>>and it's involvement or not in the process.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>     That's your guess, and you obviously have great faith in your   
   >>>>>     guess being   
   >>>>> correct, but so far you've given no reason why everyone else should   
   >>>>> put their faith in it being correct. How about if you give everybody   
   >>>>> reason to now?   
   >>>>   
   >>>>No faith is needed when there is scientific evidence,   
   >>>   
   >>>     Of what?   
   >>>   
   >>>>of which there is plenty.   
   >>>   
   >>>     Why didn't you present it then?   
   >>   
   >>Why should I bother?   
   >   
   >     Why "should" you? LOL....HILARIOUS!   
   >   
   >>Your closed mind and religious blinders would prevent you from even   
   >>seeing it, let alone understanding it.   
   >   
   >     You tried to find something to support your claim but couldn't find   
   > anything.   
      
   Snipped at first lie. Why should I cast my pearls before swine?   
   Would it change your mind? Would anything change your mind?   
      
   --   
   Smiler, The godless one.   
   aa #2279   
   Gods are all tailored to order. They are made   
   to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca