XPost: sac.politics, can.politics, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.politics.homosexuality   
   From: Dean"@gmail.com   
      
   On 6/5/2015 11:51 AM, David Johnston wrote:   
   > On 6/4/2015 11:28 PM, R. Dean wrote:   
   >> On 6/5/2015 12:46 AM, David Johnston wrote:   
   >>> On 6/4/2015 10:37 PM, R. Dean wrote:   
   >>>> On 5/23/2015 9:56 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:   
   >>>>> mur wrote in news:oqkulahndeb52016sog6b8dffeg37ae7jh@4ax.com:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> On Fri, 08 May 2015 22:03:14 -0600, David Johnston    
   >>>>>> wrote: .   
   >>>>>>> On 5/8/2015 8:03 PM, mur wrote:   
   >>>>>>>> On Wed, 29 Apr 2015 21:11:05 -0700, Jeanne Douglas   
   >>>>>>>>  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>> .   
   >>>>>>>>> In article , mur   
   >>>>>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 20 Apr 2015 15:45:06 -0500, duke    
   >>>>>>>>>> wrote: .   
   >>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 18 Apr 2015 17:58:32 -0600, David Johnston   
   >>>>>>>>>>>  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/18/2015 7:24 AM, duke wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 10 Apr 2015 19:07:02 -0600, David Johnston   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/10/2015 2:14 PM, duke wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 09 Apr 2015 14:32:02 -0600, David Johnston   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/9/2015 5:28 AM, duke wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Too much hair splitting.  Evidence exists for the presence   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of God - it can't be   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> denied.  One may not like it, but none the less, it stares   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them in the face,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hence:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> An atheist denies   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I see that you regard consistency as too much trouble to   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bother with.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You see wrong.  I'm highly consistent.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Either it can't be denied, or atheists deny it.  Pick one.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> The item that nails the supposed atheist is that he rejects   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> evidence we see.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah.  I've seen a bible too.  But Harry Potter was a more fun   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> read.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> But not any truth at all.  Unless you think you can ride a broom   
   >>>>>>>>>>> stick.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>       These people can't distinguish between things we know are   
   >>>>>>>>>>       fiction and things   
   >>>>>>>>>> no one could know are fiction.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Let's have examples of "things no one could know are fiction". 3-5   
   >>>>>>>>> examples would be a good start.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>       Any of the miracles Jesus was said to have performed,   
   >>>>>>>> including   
   >>>>>>>>       rising from   
   >>>>>>>> the dead, etc.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> What evidence do we see of that?   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>      Other than what we have, what else do you like to think there   
   >>>>>>      should be, or   
   >>>>>> even could be?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>       Evasion noted.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>       If you believe there is verifiable evidence   
   >>>>> for this deity then post it.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>> There is no empirical or verifiable evidence of the existence of a   
   >>>> deity, however there _is_ the _appearance_ of design in nature and   
   >>>> the universe.   
   >>>   
   >>> Really, really, sloppy design...   
   >>>   
   >> Explain why you think so.   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >   
   > What you want me to point you to the list of design flaws in the human   
   > body or mention the orbit of Pluto?   
    >   
   The choice is yours!   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)