XPost: sac.politics, can.politics, alt.atheism
XPost: alt.politics.homosexuality
On Fri, 29 May 2015 21:21:35 -0500, Mitchell Holman wrote:
.
>mur wrote in news:222ima5oaq0oq0p1feaornpm667nmocpfh@4ax.com:
>
>> On Sat, 23 May 2015 09:02:07 -0500, Mitchell Holman
>> wrote: .
>>>On Fri, 22 May 2015 12:03:50 -0400, mur wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Fri, 08 May 2015 22:05:15 -0600, David Johnston
>>>>wrote: .
>>>>>On 5/8/2015 8:03 PM, mur wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, 29 Apr 2015 20:50:28 -0600, David Johnston
>>>>>> wrote: .
>>>>>>> On 4/29/2015 5:58 PM, mur wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Sun, 19 Apr 2015 00:35:37 -0600, David Johnston
>>>>>>>> wrote: .
>>>>>>>>> On 4/17/2015 2:51 PM, mur wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 09 Apr 2015 06:28:06 -0500, duke
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 07 Apr 2015 17:03:53 -0400, mur wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 01 Apr 2015 11:29:59 -0500, duke
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: .
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 31 Mar 2015 20:02:20 -0400, mur. <> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 26 Mar 2015 03:19:40 -0700, Jeanne Douglas
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 25 Mar 2015 21:33:27 -0400, mur. <> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 19 Mar 2015 05:04:44 -0700, Jeanne Douglas
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article ,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> David Johnston wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/18/2015 5:11 PM, mur wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I prefer the gigantic cow hypothesis.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> One absolute consistency is that you atheists
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can only "consider" the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> possibility of God's existence in very childlike
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ways, but never in any realistic ways.Of course that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is significant since if you could think of it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any realistic way you wouldn't be restricted to an
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> atheist way of thinking,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your assumption that I am "restricted" to an atheist
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> way of thinking is false.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What the fuck is "an atheist way of thinking"?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LOL....you really can't figure out a damn thing.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why didn't you answer my question?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Before reading your post I predicted it would be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> either some sort of blatant
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lie, or more of you revealing that you can't comprehend
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what's being discussed. We'll if you can deal with it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> after I point out some basics.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. Strong atheism is the belief that there is no god
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> associated with this planet and may or may not be that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there is no type of god associated with any place(s)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in "the" universe, depending on the personal belief of the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> individual.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. Weak atheism is having no belief about whether or not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there is any god associated with any place(s) in "the"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> universe, which would necessarily involve giving
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> consideration to the possibility that there may be as well
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as that there is not if a person has been exposed to the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> idea.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Weak atheism is otherwise called agnosticism.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> There's more to it than that. Strong agnostics believe
>>>>>>>>>>>> nobody can know if
>>>>>>>>>>>> God exists. Weak agnostics believe it's possible that some
>>>>>>>>>>>> people can know if God exists. I'm a weak agnostic.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Too much hair splitting.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Why are you so overwhelmed by those easy distinctions,
>>>>>>>>>> do you have any idea?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Evidence exists for the presence of God - it can't be
>>>>>>>>>>> denied.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It is denied by blatant liars.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Yes
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Do you really believe that fact?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What fact?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That evidence is denied by blatant liars of course.
>>>>>
>>>>>What's the evidence the blatant liars are denying?
>>>>
>>>> Life itself is evidence. All accepted miracles are evidence. All
>>>> miracles
>>>>recorded in the Bible are evidence. All saints are evidence. Atheists
>>>>lying about it are evidence. All medical miracles are evidence. All
>>>>prayers that seem to have been answered are evidence. Death
>>>>experiences people have and recover from are evidence. The evidence
>>>>we have of evolution is evidence. The success of AA and NA programs
>>>>is evidence.
>>>
>>> Thor is evidence, Ra is evidence, the Mayan corn
>>>god is evidence, UFO's are evidence, ghosts are evidence,
>>>Elvis sighting are evidence. Where is your PROOF?
>>
>> WHAT sort of proof do you think there should be, WHERE do you
>> think it
>> should be, WHY do you think it should be available, and WHEN do you
>> think God should make it or should have made it available if he
>> exists?
>
> Evasion noted.
Evasion correctly predicted and noted.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
