XPost: alt.atheism, talk.atheism   
      
   On Sat, 30 May 2015 12:50:06 -0500, duke  wrote:   
   .   
   >On Fri, 29 May 2015 21:24:30 -0400, "Chris F.A. Johnson"    
   >wrote:   
   >   
   >>On 2015-05-30, mur wrote:   
   >>...   
   >>>     I've noticed that atheists never feel they need to support their   
   claims, or   
   >>> give any indication that they have any idea what they want people to think   
   they   
   >>> think they're trying to talk about.   
   >>   
   >>  Athiesm does not involve making any claims.   
   >   
   >Big mistake.  Atheism professes NO God despite all the evidence.   
      
       That's strong atheism, though as we see many if no most atheists want to   
   deny it even exists. Then we have weak atheism which involves not having a   
   belief, though I have yet to encounter someone who says they're a weak atheist   
   that behaves like one. Having no belief would involve considering the   
   possibility that God does not exist but also considering the possibility that   
   he   
   does. I've never seen any of these atheists give the slightest bit of evidence   
   that they're capable of considering the possibility that God exists. Even after   
   they claim to be able to I have never known even one of them to provide any   
   evidence of it.   
      
   >Agnostics say   
   >they don't find the evidence convincing.   
   >   
   >the dukester, American-American   
   >   
   >*****   
   >"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."   
   >Pope Paul VI   
   >*****   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)