XPost: alt.atheism, talk.atheism
From: smiler@jo.king
On Sat, 13 Jun 2015 14:04:21 -0400, mur wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Jun 2015 22:01:46 +0000 (UTC), Smil stupidly wrote:
> .
>>On Fri, 05 Jun 2015 16:23:33 -0400, mur wrote:
>>
>>>On Sat, 30 May 2015 20:55:29 +0000 (UTC), Smil wrote:
>>>.
>>>>On Fri, 29 May 2015 20:45:41 -0400, mur wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Fri, 22 May 2015 19:30:22 +0000 (UTC), Smil wrote:
>>>>>.
>>>>>>On Fri, 22 May 2015 12:04:27 -0400, mur wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sat, 9 May 2015 21:56:26 +0000 (UTC), Smil wrote:
>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>On Fri, 08 May 2015 22:02:27 -0400, mur wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 30 Apr 2015 08:39:01 -0400, raven1
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>>>On Wed, 29 Apr 2015 23:18:42 -0400, "Chris F.A. Johnson"
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>On 2015-04-30, mur wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>...
>>>>>>>>>>>> The fact that there are no examples of reptiles in
>>>>>>>>>>>> transition stages to
>>>>>>>>>>>> birds, or mammals in transition stages to flying mammals,
>>>>>>>>>>>> etc, alive today is evidence that something (like God) had
>>>>>>>>>>>> deliberate influence on evolution.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> If there are no examples, it is evidence that they either
>>>>>>>>>>> haven't been found yet or that there aren't any. It says
>>>>>>>>>>> nothing whatsoever about the existence of something like God
>>>>>>>>>>> or anything else.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>We do have transitional fossils of reptile-to-bird evolution,
>>>>>>>>>>Archaeopteryx being the most celebrated. But whether we did or
>>>>>>>>>>not, you are correct that this is irrelevant to the existence of
>>>>>>>>>>a deity,
>>>>>>>>>>and it's involvement or not in the process.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> That's your guess, and you obviously have great faith in
>>>>>>>>> your guess being
>>>>>>>>> correct, but so far you've given no reason why everyone else
>>>>>>>>> should put their faith in it being correct. How about if you
>>>>>>>>> give everybody reason to now?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>No faith is needed when there is scientific evidence,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Of what?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>of which there is plenty.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Why didn't you present it then?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Why should I bother?
>>>>>
>>>>> Why "should" you? LOL....HILARIOUS!
>>>>>
>>>>>>Your closed mind and religious blinders would prevent you from even
>>>>>>seeing it, let alone understanding it.
>>>>>
>>>>> You tried to find something to support your claim but couldn't
>>>>> find
>>>>>anything. Maybe at some point in the future you will, or maybe you
>>>>>never will be able to, but you're infantile wussings have made it
>>>>>clear that you couldn't support your claims the last time I
>>>>>challenged you to try.
>>>>
>>>>Snipped . . . Why should I . . .
>>>
>>> To provide some evidence that you have any idea at all what you
>>> think you're
>>>trying to talk about. So far you've given the clear appearance that you
>>>don't have any idea and can't even pretend you do.
>>
>>Your mental masturbation is yours and yours alone.
>>>>Would it change your mind? Would anything change your mind?
>>>
>>> Your cowardly attempts to wuss away from yourself certainly don't.
>>> If you
>>>could do better it might, depending on what you could come up with. I
>>>do consider the possibility that there's no God associated with this
>>>planet, but since I don't have faith in that being the correct one I
>>>consider other possibilities as well.
>>
>>Thanks for admitting that NOTHING would change your closed mind.
Now tell us exactly what would change your mind.
--
Smiler, The godless one.
aa #2279
Gods are all tailored to order. They are made
to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
