XPost: sac.politics, can.politics, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.politics.homosexu, ality   
   From: niunian@ymail.com   
      
   On Mon, 15 Jun 2015 10:48:47 -0600, David Johnston wrote:   
      
   > On 6/15/2015 7:13 AM, niunian wrote:   
   >> On Sun, 14 Jun 2015 19:28:56 -0600, David Johnston wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> On 6/14/2015 3:45 PM, niunian wrote:   
   >>>> On Sun, 14 Jun 2015 15:50:02 -0400, M.I.Wakefield wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> "niunian"  wrote in message news:mlkj2b$tn6$23@dont-email.me...   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> Very well. I'm glad to hear that. I guess now you are ready to   
   >>>>>> accept the fact that physical science can not explain life and   
   >>>>>> intelligence which happen to be spiritual in nature. Right?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Begs the question.  Argument fail.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> There is no such thing. Life is spiritual in nature.   
   >>>   
   >>> Life is biological in nature.   
   >>   
   >> No. Life is only biological in appearance. Consciousness as the sign of   
   >> life is spiritual in nature.   
   >   
   > I do not believe that plants are conscious.   
      
   A mere different level of consciousness. Nevertheless, it's still   
   consciousness.   
      
   >   
   >>It can not be detected by physical science.   
   >   
   > Physical science can definitely detect differences between a conscious   
   > and an unconscious person.   
      
   I don't think so. Being able to monitor the bodily function is not the   
   same as detecting consciousness. Reproducing the bodily function   
   certainly does not always bring back consciousness either.   
      
   >   
   >> To claim otherwise is to believe in ghost hunting.   
   >>   
   >>   
   > What's the problem with ghost hunting?   
      
   It's defined by the scientists themselves as pseudo-science.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)