Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.agnosticism    |    A religion for those who hate religion?    |    213,516 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 212,487 of 213,516    |
|    niunian to David Johnston    |
|    Re: In the atheist bible, is homosexuali    |
|    15 Jun 15 22:41:37    |
      XPost: sac.politics, can.politics, alt.atheism       XPost: alt.politics.homosexu, ality       From: niunian@ymail.com              On 2015-06-15 04:58 PM, David Johnston wrote:       > On 6/15/2015 1:56 PM, niunian wrote:       >       >>>> No. Life is only biological in appearance. Consciousness as the sign of       >>>> life is spiritual in nature.       >>>       >>> I do not believe that plants are conscious.       >>       >> A mere different level of consciousness. Nevertheless, it's still       >> consciousness.       >       > Your assertion is noted.              I believe there are different levels of consciousness. There is human       consciousness which is self-aware. There is animal consciousness which       is not self-aware but has self-instinct. And there is plant       consciousness which is not self-aware and has no self-instinct either.              >       >>       >>>       >>>> It can not be detected by physical science.       >>>       >>> Physical science can definitely detect differences between a conscious       >>> and an unconscious person.       >>       >> I don't think so. Being able to monitor the bodily function is not the       >> same as detecting consciousness. Reproducing the bodily function       >> certainly does not always bring back consciousness either.       >       > How does one reproduce conscious brain activity?              I'm not sure. I don't think there is a way to reproduce conscious brain       activity without consciousness being present in the first place.                     >       >>       >>>       >>>> To claim otherwise is to believe in ghost hunting.       >>>>       >>>>       >>> What's the problem with ghost hunting?       >>       >> It's defined by the scientists themselves as pseudo-science.       >>       >       > Only because they've done it long enough that they are satisfied that       > there is no there, there.              That's so sad to hear. If that is what happened, then the scientists are       even more clueless about the spiritual existence than I have imagined.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca