XPost: sac.politics, can.politics, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.politics.homosexuality   
      
   On Fri, 19 Jun 2015 21:21:12 -0500, Mitchell Holman  wrote:   
   .   
   >mur wrote in news:bbu8oadr64djgn3sgnlmlas8l6hb70to65@4ax.com:   
   >   
   >> On Mon, 15 Jun 2015 16:49:29 -0700, Jeanne Douglas   
   >>  wrote:   
   >> .   
   >>>In article , niunian    
   >>>wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> On Sun, 14 Jun 2015 16:40:11 -0700, Jeanne Douglas wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>> >> >> > Answer the question: What "evidence of God" are you talking   
   >>>> >> >> > about?   
   >>>> >> >>   
   >>>> >> >> If you don't already know, then I don't have to tell.   
   >>>> >> >   
   >>>> >> >   
   >>>> >> > And yet another attempt at deflection.   
   >>>> >> >   
   >>>> >> > Answer the question: What "evidence of God" are you talking   
   >>>> >> > about?   
   >>>> >>   
   >>>> >> I think that was a question directed at the non-believers. Do I   
   >>>> >> have to chew your food for you every time?   
   >>>> >   
   >>>> >   
   >>>> > And yet another deflection attempt. Why would I be asking my   
   >>>> > fellow non-believers for evidence of your god?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> I don't know, but have you tried asking yourself such question?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> >   
   >>>> > Now try again and this time actually answer the question you were   
   >>>> > asked.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> I think I have answered such question to you specifically too many   
   >>>> times last year. Why asking me again since none of I said made any   
   >>>> difference? What I would like to know is what evidence of God you   
   >>>> are expecting. Can you answer that?   
   >>>   
   >>>You have NEVER answered anybody's questions   
   >>   
   >>     Try demonstrating your self-believed superiority and answer the   
   >>     challenge he   
   >> made to you then. That goes out to ANY OF YOU! This challenge is to   
   >> every one of you:   
   >>   
   >> Try to explain WHAT type of evidence you think there should be, WHERE   
   >> you think it should be, WHY you think it should be available to   
   >> humans, and WHEN you think it should have been or should be made   
   >> available, if there truly is a God associated with this planet.   
   >   
   >   
   >     There is enough evidence for YOU to believe in this god.   
   >   
   >     What evidence is that?   
      
       I don't have a belief. I consider the possibility that there is not and   
   that   
   there is. I don't put faith in either of them being correct. It's just that   
   considering that there could be takes a lot more consideration and involves a   
   lot more thinking than putting faith in the possibility there is not.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)