XPost: sac.politics, can.politics, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.politics.homosexuality   
   From: David@block.net   
      
   On 7/3/2015 8:19 PM, mur wrote:   
   > On Fri, 26 Jun 2015 20:16:52 -0600, David Johnston  wrote:   
   > .   
   >> On 6/26/2015 7:55 PM, mur wrote:   
   >>> On Sat, 13 Jun 2015 14:07:37 -0600, David Johnston  wrote:   
   >>> .   
   >>>> On 6/13/2015 12:04 PM, mur wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>          What about turtles and crocodiles etc?   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> What about them?   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>         I consider them dinosaurs.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Really?  I consider them space hamsters.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>        That explains a lot about your "thinking".   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Well as long as we are going arbitrarily consider things to be things   
   >>>> they are not,   
   >>>   
   >>>       As yet I have no reason not to consider them dinosaurs.   
   >>   
   >> Ignorance is an invincible defense.  Since you don't know about the   
   >> skeletal and metabolic differences, you need not consider them.   
   >   
   >      I looked into it a little bit and it seems those animals were around   
   before   
   > and after dinosaurs.   
   >   
      
   Yes.  They were.  This in no way makes them dinosaurs.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)