XPost: sac.politics, can.politics, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.politics.homosexuality   
      
   On Mon, 20 Jul 2015 19:01:33 -0400, Vincent Maycock  wrote:   
   .   
   >On Mon, 20 Jul 2015 17:07:21 -0500, duke  wrote:   
   >   
   >>On Sun, 19 Jul 2015 14:52:21 -0400, Vincent Maycock  wrote:   
   >>   
   >>>On Sun, 19 Jul 2015 09:15:16 -0500, duke  wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>>On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 17:12:10 -0400, Vincent Maycock  wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>In standard Christian theology, God cares about the lost but has other   
   >>>>>things to contend with that prevent him from helping them.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>Haahaahaa.  Vince, that's the most stupid comment I've ever had the   
   misfortune   
   >>>>to witness.   
   >>>   
   >>>No, Christians do it all the time; "God had to do this because ..." or   
   >>>"the only we way could truly have free will is if God ..." etc., etc.   
   >>   
   >>And your massive error suggests God is too busy.  Haahaahaa.   
   >   
   >The things that get in the way did not include "things that take up   
   >his time,"   
      
       LOL! Hilarious!!!   
      
   >idiot.   
   >   
   >>>>>So if we assume he can, then the resolution to the conundrum would be   
   >>>>>that God simultaneously can and can't lift the rock; in this idea, he   
   >>>>>exists in a superposition of states like those found in quantum   
   >>>>>mechanics.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>Why should the creator of the universe be unable to lift the heaviest rock?   
   >>>No, it's not "the heaviest rock."   
   >>   
   >>>The conundrum goes: "Can God make a rock so big he can't lift it?"   
   >>>If he succeeds at making the rock, then "being able to lift it" is   
   >>>something he can't do, which means he's not omnipotent.   
   >>   
   >>The conundrum makes the wild assumption of error that "God can't lift it".   
   >   
   >No, it's not an assumption; it's part of a conundrum that goes "either   
   >way, you lose."   
   >   
   >So in other words, let's say that you claim God can't lift the rock.   
   >Then is he too weak to create a rock he can't lift?   
   >   
   >Think about it, and maybe after awhile you'll get it.   
      
       Omnipotence is not possible, but you obviously still don't "get it."   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)