XPost: sac.politics, can.politics, alt.atheism
XPost: alt.politics.homosexuality
On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 13:46:52 -0600, David Johnston wrote:
.
>On 8/11/2015 12:42 PM, mur wrote:
>>>>>> _________________________________________________________
>>>>>> There might not be any sort of God associated with this planet. If not,
then
>>>>>> "he" isn't going to provide any evidence, regardless of what evidence
there is,
>>>>>> and that people invent.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There might BE a God associated with this planet. If so he is OBVIOUSLY
not
>>>>>> ready to provide verifiable evidence of his existence, even if he did
so a
>>>>>> number of times in the past in addition to providing however much
evidence that
>>>>>> can not be verified.
>>>>>> ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ
>>>>>
>>>>> Nonsense. My cat sheds all over the house. What more evidence do you
>>>>> need of my cat's existence?
>>>>
>>>> Do you have any idea how you'd like to pretend that has anything to
do with
>>>> what you're trying to talk about?
>>>
>>> What reason do you have to believe that my cat is not a god? In what
>>> way does it violate the parameters you have established for what is and
>>> is not a god?
>>
>> One of the most basic is that I don't believe a God could be native to
a
>> planet he's God of. There are of course others, but that one is plenty good
>> enough. You people STILL have nothing.
>>
>
>Ah. So my cat would then be god of, say, Mars.
That would depend entirely on how much deliberate influence it has had on
Mars, little child. The same is true for your Teddy bear and your goldfish,
btw.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
