XPost: sac.politics, can.politics, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.politics.homosexuality   
      
   On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 11:49:45 -0700,  Goo wrote:   
   .   
   >On 8/11/2015 11:42 AM, mur wrote:   
   >> On Thu, 6 Aug 2015 22:33:30 -0600, David Johnston  wrote:   
   >> .   
   >>> On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 22:18:51 -0400, mur wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> On Fri, 31 Jul 2015 23:14:34 -0600, David Johnston    
   wrote:   
   >>>> .   
   >>>>> On Fri, 31 Jul 2015 13:03:11 -0400, mur wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> On Wed, 22 Jul 2015 20:32:45 -0400, Vincent Maycock    
   wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> On Wed, 22 Jul 2015 00:41:17 -0400, mur wrote:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 17:12:10 -0400, Vincent Maycock    
   wrote:   
   >>>>>>>> .   
   >>>>>>>>> On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 12:31:46 -0400, mur wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 04 Jul 2015 20:04:29 -0400, Vincent Maycock <   
   am100@aol.com> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>> .   
   >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 03 Jul 2015 22:18:54 -0400, mur wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 27 Jun 2015 16:49:05 -0400, Vincent Maycock   
    wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 26 Jun 2015 21:55:01 -0400, mur wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 20 Jun 2015 15:57:18 -0400, Vincent Maycock   
    wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 19 Jun 2015 16:20:49 -0400, mur wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> snip   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     Try to explain WHAT type of evidence   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any kind.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     You have no idea.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Footprints in the sand or snow?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     And you would of course be called on personally to verify   
   that they were   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> made by God, since you're such an authority. Tell us all how   
   you would know they   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> were the real thing?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't know; but remember, mur I'm not looking for "proof"   
   here, just   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> evidence.   If people were always saying, "Oh, hey, look   
   there's some   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> footprints in the snow again; probably God just made those   
   footprints,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> since I was just talking to him in prayer, and he said he was   
   nearby."   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tell us also how you know he didn't already leave   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> footprints a thousand years ago, or do other less pathetic   
   things to show of his   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> existence.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> He might have, but let's stay with what we can see and   
   experience   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rather than made-up ideas that go "how do we know ...??" and   
   so on.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>     Why shouldn't he feel that the footprints and other   
   evidence he left a   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> thousand years ago were good enough that he doesn't have to   
   keep providing it   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> over and over and over again?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A video-tape of God on the evening news?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     Being an authority on this tell us how you would also   
   verify the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> authenticity of a video "tape", and what you imagine should   
   be on it. What sort   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of sound track? What sort of narration?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm thinking David Muir from ABC World News would say   
   something like   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "And in other news today, God was seen flying through the sky   
   and   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> walking on water."   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I would consider that to be good evidence, and possibly even   
   proof,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> depending on the circumstances, that God exists.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>     From my pov he would feel justified to think he doesn't   
   need to come perform   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> tricks like that in an attempt to persuade people he apparently   
   doesn't care   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> about anyway.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> That doesn't sound like the God of the Bible ("not caring about   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> people"),   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>     My impression is that he doesn't care about some people. What   
   makes you   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> think he cares about every one of them?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> It's standard Christian theology.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>     In contrast to that some Christians believe God will send other   
   Christians   
   >>>>>>>>>> to Hell. I heard people in Methodist and Baptist churches say   
   Catholics aren't   
   >>>>>>>>>> Christians and will be sent to Hell. In a Church of God I heard a   
   preacher tell   
   >>>>>>>>>> the congregation Mormons aren't Christian. I don't believe God   
   would send his   
   >>>>>>>>>> own people to Hell, and maybe not even those of you who work   
   against him but I   
   >>>>>>>>>> sure can't think of any good reason why he should care about people   
   like you,   
   >>>>>>>>>> and things I've read in the Bible indicate that he doesn't. If you   
   think he   
   >>>>>>>>>> should give a shit about you though, I'm sure it would be good fun   
   to see you   
   >>>>>>>>>> try to explain why so please make an attempt.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> In standard Christian theology, God cares about the lost but has   
   other   
   >>>>>>>>> things to contend with that prevent him from helping them.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> snip   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> an   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> omnipotent being should be able to change it for the better.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>     I believe omnipotence is not possible. Why do you believe it   
   is?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> I don't believe in it, but I do think the concept is logically   
   >>>>>>>>>>> coherent, if you construct logical worlds where A is not equal to   
   >>>>>>>>>>> itself.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>     Try doing it. So far it just sounds like more bullshit.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> This comes from the "rock so big you can't use it" paradox, which   
   >>>>>>>>> reduces to the question of can God cause A and (not A) to be true at   
   >>>>>>>>> the same time.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> So if we assume he can,   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>     I don't. You do.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> then the resolution to the conundrum would be   
   >>>>>>>>> that God simultaneously can and can't lift the rock;   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>     You live in your own universe of make believe.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> in this idea, he   
   >>>>>>>>> exists in a superposition of states like those found in quantum   
   >>>>>>>>> mechanics.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you think there should be, WHERE you   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think it should be,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anywhere.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     You have no idea.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In the snow or sand?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     How you would verify? To start with, explain this:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Devil's_Footprints   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> These animal tracks are scarcely different in quality from the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> evidence for Bigfoot, what with all the questions indicating   
   that it's   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)