XPost: alt.atheism, alt.talk.creationism, sci.skeptic   
   XPost: alt.philosophy   
   From: sylvia@not.at.this.address   
      
   On 30/05/2016 1:14 PM, Dale wrote:   
   > On Mon, 30 May 2016 12:12:50 +1000, Sylvia Else   
   >  wrote:   
   >   
   >> On 30/05/2016 3:34 AM, Dale wrote:   
   >>> Affirming the consequent   
   >>>   
   >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affirming_the_consequent   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>> if an atheistic cosmos then some atheistic parts   
   >>>   
   >>> some atheistic parts   
   >>> an atheistic cosmos   
   >>   
   >>> applies to a recent discussion where a poster said abiogenesis (life   
   >>> from non-life) "had" to happen, whereas we have never observed it and   
   >>> observe biogenesis (life from life)   
   >>   
   >> Or you simply misconstrued the posting. If you'd give specifics, we   
   >> could form a judgement. At the moment, you're asking us to take your   
   >> conclusion on trust.   
   >   
   > (if atheistic cosmos therefore abiogenesis) therefore (if abiogenesis   
   > therefore atheistic cosmos)   
   >   
   > see the thread on talk.origins   
   > Subject: ID after the Bait and Switch   
   > original post Message-ID:    
   >   
   >> Now there's a familiar feeling - what does it   
   >> remind me of?   
   >>   
   >> Sylvia.   
   >   
   > apologies, I did a copy/paste without consideration   
   > --   
   > Dale   
   > http://www.dalekelly.org   
   >   
      
   So, this post then:   
      
      
      
   Now, how does that support your claim?   
      
   Sylvia.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)