XPost: alt.atheism, alt.talk.creationism, sci.skeptic   
   XPost: alt.philosophy   
   From: dale@dalekelly.org   
      
   On Mon, 30 May 2016 13:45:30 +1000, Sylvia Else   
    wrote:   
      
   >On 30/05/2016 1:14 PM, Dale wrote:   
   >> On Mon, 30 May 2016 12:12:50 +1000, Sylvia Else   
   >>  wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> On 30/05/2016 3:34 AM, Dale wrote:   
   >>>> Affirming the consequent   
   >>>>   
   >>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affirming_the_consequent   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> if an atheistic cosmos then some atheistic parts   
   >>>>   
   >>>> some atheistic parts   
   >>>> an atheistic cosmos   
   >>>   
   >>>> applies to a recent discussion where a poster said abiogenesis (life   
   >>>> from non-life) "had" to happen, whereas we have never observed it and   
   >>>> observe biogenesis (life from life)   
   >>>   
   >>> Or you simply misconstrued the posting. If you'd give specifics, we   
   >>> could form a judgement. At the moment, you're asking us to take your   
   >>> conclusion on trust.   
   >>   
   >> (if atheistic cosmos therefore abiogenesis) therefore (if abiogenesis   
   >> therefore atheistic cosmos)   
   >>   
   >> see the thread on talk.origins   
   >> Subject: ID after the Bait and Switch   
   >> original post Message-ID:    
   >>   
   >>> Now there's a familiar feeling - what does it   
   >>> remind me of?   
   >>>   
   >>> Sylvia.   
   >>   
   >> apologies, I did a copy/paste without consideration   
   >> --   
   >> Dale   
   >> http://www.dalekelly.org   
   >>   
   >   
   >So, this post then:   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >Now, how does that support your claim?   
   >   
   >Sylvia.   
   >   
      
   you kind of have to read the parts of the thread I was in   
   --   
   Dale   
   http://www.dalekelly.org   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)